User talk:CLCStudent/Archive 47
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 40 | ← | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
A cup of tea for you!
|
Thanks for your kind reply to my Q. We may have different opinions but I respect yours and understand that we are all here to improve Wikipedia. DBigXrayᗙ 17:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC) |
Always good to start a convo with a cup of tea. Since the RfA has been closed I am forced to continue it here. I feel that your criteria for RfA is much stricter than what the community currently agrees upon. It is always good to have a perfect RfA candidate with an all round experience, but as we all know a perfect RfA candidate doesnt really exist. IMHO it is too harsh to expect an editor who has an interest in gnoming and wants the tool for gnoming being denied that due to lack of experience in something he does not intend to work in. This ultimately harms wikipedia because folks who are otherwise fit for mopping dont get it and burdens the existing admin corps, leading to delay in mopping which affects everyone, including you and me. I hope you will think about the point I am trying to make. --DBigXrayᗙ 17:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)