This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This is not vandalism. Few (if any) historians consider the Augustan History to be a reliable source, it's not even thought to have been a serious source, but a mostly fictitious parody of Roman histories. This was an improper use of rollback and warning. Mr rnddude (talk) 23:33, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
