User talk:CNGLITCHINFO

KH Birth by Sleep[edit]

Hello. I was wondering if you could explain the reason for the move of "Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep" to "Kingdom Hearts: Birth by Sleep". The title has frequently appeared in Square Enix press releases and gaming news website articles without the colon. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 19:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

October 2009[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one fortnight to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Cartoon Network (United States). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CNGLITCHINFO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what was a disrupting? he was removing correct info about it just because he didnt like it! im trying to fix wikipedia! wtf?

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Blueboy 96 03:54, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CNGLITCHINFO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what was a disrupting? he was removing correct info about it just because he didnt like it! im trying to fix wikipedia! wtf? i am not the one disrupting, he is! why isnt he blocked? im innocent in this situation!

Decline reason:

Stop accusing everyone else, it only makes you come across as wanting to get someone sanctioned and will only add justification to your block. Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 04:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CNGLITCHINFO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

problem is that i DIDNT do anything!!!! thats why i'm talking about others!!!

Decline reason:

The block is valid. If you continue to abuse the unblock template I will remove your ability to edit this page. Chillum 04:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chances are very good you did, else you wouldn't be blocked and we wouldn't even be having this conversation. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 04:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page privileges revoked. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 09:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/411connor for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Saylaveer (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]