User talk:CSMention269/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 7

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Ghani (politician) has been accepted

Abdul Ghani (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

There is not a capital letter after a comma

I.E, About Dr Jackson is not rweal (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Hi, please report possible sockpuppetry behaviour regarding page Lacey Hull on WP:SPI or WP:ARV instead of edit-warring with them. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 14:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

@Lemonaka, appologise, I wasn't aware of that. I don't remember at that time that I reverted twice on this page before per 3RR. Because a similar case has happened before, and I asked The Herald for clarification about the next step, knowing 3RR rules. CSMention269 (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Please compare edit pattern between 2600:1700:3c20:4ca0:d023:4ec8:81cf:9402 (talk · contribs) and newly registered user Jdhy73648 (talk · contribs), that's obvious. Yes, reverting vandalism is a kind of WP:3RRNO, but it will waste your time for contributing if you engaged deeply in that. -Lemonaka‎ 14:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Then I may have overlooked it, or else I would have reported it earlier. Because previously a same case has been appeared, see User_talk:The_Herald#Saadbibras_edit_on_Bushra_Bibi. Anyways, I will be more careful about this. CSMention269 (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

This wasn't a case of sockpuppetry, at least not in the way described above. I have now explained this at the bottom of [1]. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of WP:ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Legal threat at Talk:Texas Band of Yaqui Indians. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hello CSMention269,

When restoring content to a biography of a living person, such as the article about Lacey Hull, you are responsible for your own actions and need to ensure that you are not blindly restoring badly sourced, contentious material.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

@ToBeFree, I will be cautioned next time. CSMention269 (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

I think you mean cautious.

Thanks and no worries. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Bachhrawan railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bachhrawan railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachhrawan railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User4edits (talk) 07:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naveen Jain (politician) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoglophie was:

Article has factual errors. First of all, he is only nominated for now, please wait until he is elected as a Rajya Sabha member. Then he will easily pass WP:POLITICIAN. At present being a mayor is not enough to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naveen Jain (politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

zoglophie^•talk• 09:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@Zoglophie, with due respect, kindly check on 2024 Rajya Sabha elections and [2] where 16 out 56 seats is currently been contested, remainders are elected unopposed, including this guy. Their names has been updated a long time ago. CSMention269 (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhim Singh (Bihar politician) has been accepted

Bhim Singh (Bihar politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.