User talk:Caiweijie

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hey there, Caiweijie, and welcome to our great encyclopedia, which currently has more than 6,827,958 articles! Even with this large number, all of your contributions are important (including the small ones), and I hope you like the place and decide to stay! Here's a few starting tips for you:

You might want to check out the welcome page.
Then you can have a look at our guidelines.
After that, you can see here for a cheatsheet on editing pages (for a bigger list, see here).

After reading all this (or even just glimpsing at it), I can understand that you might feel apprehensive about editing and contributing articles, for fear of making a mistake. But don't worry too much about mistakes; after all, you're new. Instead, everyone here encourages you to be bold! If you need help with anything, feel free to leave me a message, or you can put {{helpme}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to give you a hand.

One last thing: when leaving a message on someone's talk page, don't forget to put four "tildes" (~~~~) to automatically sign your name.

Happy Editing! -- P.B. Pilhet 16:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:P2140024edited5pg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:P2140024edited5pg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Daniel_Lee_07.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Daniel_Lee_07.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Album 02 - Unavoidable.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Album 02 - Unavoidable.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Daniel Lee Celebration Edition 01.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Daniel Lee Celebration Edition 01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gubra Poster.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gubra Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Daniel Lee Celebration Edition 01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Daniel Lee Celebration Edition 01.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pensiangan unopposed[edit]

Hi and welcome. In the page Malaysian general election, 2008, under the "Reason of win" section for Pensiangan, u wrote: "Returning officer mistakenly accepted opponents' nominations after nomination period". This is not a reason of win. It seems confusing and doesnt explain why the other candidates lost. A simple explanation why Kurup won was: The other two candidates arrived late. I'm not sure why we have to explain mistakes by the returning officer. ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 04:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct me again what im not understanding. The mistake made by the returning officer caused the EC to announce that there would be a three-way fight. I ask a simple question: Did the mistake made by the returning officer caused Kurup to win? No. Kurup won because the other candidates disqualified. I think this is a much simple and straightforward explanation. ќמшמφטтгמ^torque 08:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muallaf[edit]

There are multiple problems with these images:

You are uploading them as "For use in Wikipedia only" which is not an acceptable license. Items uploaded with this license are immediately deleted. If this is the restriction the (c) holder has placed on them, then they can not be used here.
You stated the Director has given permission - the director most likely does not have the ability to give permission for use, as the (c) holder is not the director but the film company MHZ Film Sdn. Bhd.
There is a limit on the number of non-free images (and these would all be non-free) used in any article. The film poster is 1, and that would leave only 1 or 2 others that would be acceptable (there's not set limit, but c. 3 is the norm). Even if you uploaded these as "non-free screenshot" you'd run into the same problem with the number of images used
To prove the film company has released these images for general use, you'll have to go through the WP:OTRS system to get specific written release for each one of them.

You will need to clear up all of these problems before the images could be used herein. Skier Dude (talk) 08:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The director may have permission to use them, but again, you're going to need to prove that this permission has been given to Wikipedia from the film company. The only way to do this as it stands now is with the WP:OTRS system. And, combined images are counted by the number of images that are combined therein, so that's never a legitimate work-around of fair use. Skier Dude (talk) 08:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks[edit]

Please consider this your first warning that if you continue to add dead picture links to Muallaf such as [1] and [2] you will be blocked from editing for disruption/vandalism. You need to rectify the images (c) status before adding "redlinks" to articles. Skier Dude (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Actors in Yasmin Ahmad films[edit]

Template:Actors in Yasmin Ahmad films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 02:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:P2140024edited5pg.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:P2140024edited5pg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mkativerata (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Your addition to Nutrilite has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Reconsider ! 04:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Hi, File:Pasti Daniel.jpg, File:Sharing Danell.jpg, and File:Daniel Lee Celebration Album.jpg are nominated for deletion for missing licensing information. Regards Hekerui (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Chinapress 20110518.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chinapress 20110518.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]