User talk:Caliph Ibrahim

List of Assyrian musicians[edit]

You can't move this page every time without a real reason and source! If you move it back again I will report you! This is vandalism. --Anonymous17 (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you did this to other pages, if I see something like this again like in Al-Qamishli where you replaced the Assyrian name with the Aramean without any reason I will also report you immediately.--Anonymous17 (talk) 08:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Sootoro. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 18:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

I am doing my best

Palmyrene Empire[edit]

Well, do you have any idea how many people of the Aramean-Assyrian-Syriac-Chaldean controversy people have been blocked ? As for this article which I wrote, Palmyrene is an Aramaic dialect, its pointless to write that both Aramaic and Palmyrene were spoken. they spoke the Palmyrene dialect and that's it. Aramaic is not a different language. As for the population, aside from the fact that this was an Empire that included different ethnicities, the city itself had Arabs constituting half of its population. [Trevor Bryce. Ancient Syria, Oxford university press]. If you reverted then this will be a POV pushing and will be reported.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 13:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, when you write Aramean next to Palmyrene, then you are making them look like two different languages. you either write Aramaic which is a general term that include Syriac, Nabatean....etc or you write the specific term : Palmyrene. as for the state itself, It was not an Aramaic state but an Aramaic speaking state. it was built by all the people who built it. If you wrote Aramean state, someone will come and write : Arab state !! so its better to stay away from those designations. Anyway, the article of Palmyra itself clearly state that this city started as Aramaic and had Aramaic language and culture. Cheers.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 13:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary Edits[edit]

Please refrain from making unnecessary edits, like adding "Arameans" as related people to the Assyrian people page -- the Assyrian people page already includes Arameans: it's written in the first sentence of the page. It is also unnecessary to move the Assyrian singers page to Assyrian/Aramean singers page. Again, it's trite: Aramean is already included in the Assyrian people page. Penguins53 (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)Penguins53[reply]

I'm actually a Suryoyo whose family is from Midyat. Anyways, I do not deny an Aramean identity. There is an Assyrian identity, an Aramean identity, and a Chaldean identity. However, all of those differing identities belong to the same ethnic group. I honestly think it's repetitive to include Aramean/Assyrian because if you click Assyrian people the very first sentence makes it obviously clear that "the Assyrian people, also known as Chaldeans, Syriacs, and Arameans.." Therefore, it was redundant Penguins53 (talk) 00:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Penguins53[reply]

As another user who reverted your edits on the Ephrem the Syrian page says, "All different names given to Syriac Christians are covered in that article." Penguins53 (talk) 00:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Penguins53[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of Assyrian musicians has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shmayo (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He moved the page again to "List of Arameans/Assyrians...". Someone should move the page back, he moved the page for the second time without an reason. --Anonymous17 (talk) 11:46, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian people[edit]

The sentences you removed are explained in the article and referenced. Deleting them is POV. Syrians were arabized and islamised. they were pagans then christians then moslims... it doesnt matter. I hope that you abstain from such edits. As for the people who call themselves Arameans, they are also moslims in Jubb'adin AND Al-Sarkha (Bakhah). Any way, the article is clear and say that syrians are either arabized or just arameans. The article doe not mix them.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 22:05, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Be Careful[edit]

Be careful with your editing, you may find yourself blocked. Wiki Admin don't take too kindly to the last few edit that Penguin53 has undone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Penguins53 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr 76 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a tendentious single-purpose edit-warring account. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can you give me some more explanation as to why I'm blocked and why you're only intervenes after 3 weeks and why is penguins53 not blocked? I see a form of racism here, I think it's ridiculous that I'm blocked the only one who must be blocked is you!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caliph Ibrahim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

he did not give me a good explanation why I am blocked maybe I was in an edit war but that is almost 4 weeks ago and why is pinguins53 not blocked he was with me in an edit war I see here a from of racism here becouse User:Future Perfect at Sunrise always block people who are pro Aramean and anti Assyrian I want more explanation and I want to be unblocked becouse I did not do anything wrong the last edit I did was on a talk page to vote for changing the name of Assyrian people to Syriac people because of that I see a from of racism User:Future Perfect at Sunrise makes abuse of his power to block people Caliph el Muslemin 11:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked because your entire purpose on Wikipedia is to push a specific point of view, at times with outright deceptive edit summaries, for example here, but without any reliable sources backing up your edits. Huon (talk) 11:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.