User talk:CallawayRox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, CallawayRox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 23:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
For assisting on the rescue of Dog daycare. Bearian (talk) 18:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter[edit]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Volume I, Issue III
February 2012

To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page.
ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.


WikiProject Cleanup[edit]

Hello, CallawayRox.

You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you![edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
For your diligence in updating The Oatmeal and FunnyJunk legal dispute! Jokestress (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Burkie Barnstar
For your bold effort in creating the article You didn't build that before it was changed into a redirect page, I hereby present to you this barnstar. May it guide you in your continued edits on articles woes subjects relate to conservatism, and bring neutrality to those articles tainted with liberal bias. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You didn't edit that![edit]

Woof! - Wikidemon (talk) 22:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2012 Harvard cheating scandal[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:05, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Obie (dog)[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

User:Colonel Warden/Orville (cat), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Colonel Warden/Orville (cat) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Colonel Warden/Orville (cat) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for the assist which reminded me of a recent appearance which I have added - Orville showed up on TV just the other day. He was #27 in that chart but not nearly as scary as #24 - the fearsome cobra cat. Anyway, you might like to help out at skateboarding dog now... Warden (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • LOL nice move. I found a Orvillecopter page on EFlightwiki with more info on the copter. Skateboarding dog looks tough because Google keeps giving me videos. CallawayRox (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Grumpy Cat[edit]

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Bub[edit]

I saw that you're working on a Lil Bub article. I can't believe we don't have one yet! It looks good. Do you have a photo? If not, let me know and I'll upload something. Pburka (talk) 04:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A free photo would be good. Someone put a stolen photo in Grumpy Cat and I had to take it out. CallawayRox (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Hi Callaway Rox. I'm new to all of this, also I'm a cat which makes even more confusing. I would like to submit a photo to you, but I don't know how to do it. I've got the perfect one. You can email me directly as well (Iamlilbub (talk) 22:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

DYK review[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Dove Real Beauty Sketches. If you could add a review icon to it (they are listed at the top of the edit screen), it will alert others that the review is complete.

Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 03:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lil Bub & Friendz[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lil Bub[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kate Garvey[edit]

Orlady (talk) 08:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pet travel[edit]

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

right on

Noxgandhi (talk) 09:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Outlook.com IMAP[edit]

Hi, There seems to be a dispute over whether or not a Reddit AMA comment can be used as a source in the Outlook.com article. To avoid it turning into an edit war, I've started a talk page thread to resolve the issue: Talk:Outlook.com#Reddit AMA as source for IMAP announcement. Please join in so we can reach a consensus. Thanks! Indrek (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ben Lashes[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Obie (dog) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obie (dog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obie (dog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ben Lashes[edit]

The article Ben Lashes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Ben lashes appears to be non-notable, most RS only mention him in relation to his talent

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the Proposed Deletion was contested, I've started a regular deletion discussion here. PeterTheFourth (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of East River Monster for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East River Monster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East River Monster (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 12:30, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bug-a-Salt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack (cat) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack (cat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack (cat) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 00:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]