User talk:Calum G Fraser

Feedback on your work!

Hi, Calum! I told your professor I'd give a bit of feedback on each of your sandboxes, so please see my comments below:

• Prof. Webster mentioned you may want to incorporate this research into the existing Rettig Report article, which I think is a great idea. Don't forget to utilize the existing text and add yours in! You can always reorganize the article in a way you think best, but you want to be careful not to remove any reliable references or helpful formatting.
• One of the most important aspects of a Wikipedia article is that they have in-line citations throughout the article. That means that any one or two sentences can be verified by a reader who scans the article and wants to check reliability. Your references look good, but can you cite all of the facts throughout the article? If someone comes along and rearranges/reorganizes the content, you want each point to still be verifiable!
  • As an example, can you source the sentence "The Supreme Court of Chile also opposed the Allende government and publicly decried it for failing to comply with some judicial decisions"?
• As to references, you currently have URLs for a lot of them without any context. This handout can hopefully help you out, and you can definitely use the Reference toolbar in the editing box, which I find extremely helpful!
• There are a few other formatting issues that really aren't a big deal—someone else can always come along who has a bit more experience with editing and wiki code. :) Still, if you want to learn more about wikilinks (links to other articles), your text could definitely use them to give unfamiliar readers a chance to understand jargon and/or get more information on relevant topics.

Hope this helps and gives you some steps you can take! Please ping me on my talk page if any questions come up! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 21:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Some of this could definitely be integrated into Rettig commission article but need to be much clearer that there were two truth commissions (of which Rettig is one). Dwebsterbu (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Calum G Fraser/sandbox (November 23)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Calum G Fraser/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Calum G Fraser, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your draft article, User:Calum G Fraser/sandbox

Hello Calum G Fraser. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Calum G Fraser/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Calum G Fraser/sandbox

Hello Calum G Fraser. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Calum G Fraser/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 02:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)