User talk:Cam5643

Block evasion[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cam5643 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

after adding a citation in the following page I´m blocked with no explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbalax ICam5643 (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An explanation has been provided and appears to be accurate. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, you were blocked for evading this block. Note that meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry are both equally blockable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:11, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It´s a lie I added a citation and have been blocked with no explanation. It´s my first account on this website. Once again it´s a lie, you aree welcome to do a WP:SPI.

Given the timing WP:MEATPUPPET applies here, which is also blockable. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This does not apply to my account, I´m new the timimg says nothing about me or my account. Millions of users are on this website daily and at the same time. You argument is not valuable. Cam5643 (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I´m taking this dispute to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents you have no reason to block my account.

I tried to make a request on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard OhNoitsJamie Talk also bloked me on that page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cam5643 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I´m trying to resolve this problem with you again you blocked my account without any concrete proof. I can´t even file a dispute resolution. Wikipedia ban policies WP:BAN that you are not respecting. Citation was added OhNoitsJamie Talk deleted it Cam5643 (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't address your meat puppetry or your disruptive editing, which was there even without the edit you describe here. 331dot (talk) 08:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cam5643 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unvalid reason for declension based on a biased admnistrator. Every question have been addressed hence this long conversation. User:OhNoitsJamie Talk did not talk about an alleged disruptive editing because there was none User:331dot rdisrutive editing. Cam5643 (talk) 11:50, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #58952 [edit]

is closed. User should make an unblock request here, asking that their appeal be carried to WP:AN. As someone with no idea what's going on, in theory, I'd be happy to do so, but in full sight of the community. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sequence of events ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/FromSenegal This user is blocked for repeatedly making poorly sourced edits, most of which involve removing/replacing well-sourced assertions having to do with removing any references to Gambia as part of a regional origin (2) Immediately after that account is blocked, this account is created and makes a single edit, once again removing Gambia and adding a difference source, the exact type of edit the recently blocked account had done. It was clear this was either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry; a cursory CU check on FromSenegal suggests the latter. If this user is only here to resume the disruptive editing that another user has been blocked for, there's no reason to lift the block. If Cam5643 has other non-disruptive editing interests, I wouldn't oppose an unblock. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra I can´t make an unblock request to WP:AN. @Ohnoitsjamie completely blocked the account while he is stating here the total oposite. Cam5643 (talk) 02:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is my only and first account. I´ve been blocked without a possiblity to request a resolution , the ban did not follow the WP:BAN policies. Cam5643 (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:GAB. You do indeed have path to resolution; address the meatpuppetry detailed above, and describe what other edits you would make if unblocked; hopefully, these edits would not included systematically removing mentions of Gambia from music and culture articles. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation confirming where the music genre really is from. like I said this is my first account I have nothing to do with the meatpupperty you are accuming this is against Wikipedia policy. If I get unblocked depending on the subject I´m dealing with at the moment I will edit artilces whith citations and hoprefully you will not just delete them out of unprofessionalism. Now if I just edited without any proof I could understand and accept the decision made, but with the citation I gave this is unacceptable from your part. Addititonally this website is meant to be edited by anyone, you can´t tell me what I have to edit or not unless I can´t do give a citation. Cam5643 (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Meant to be editing by anyone" doesn't mean everyone can do as they please. The fact that you are blocked from editing at the moment should've made that clear. You're not going to be unblocked if you're only here to edit war about Senegal and Gambia, regardless of what citations you throw around. You've also failed to address why your first edit to Wikipedia happened to be similar to an edit a different user had been blocked for less than an hour earlier. To quote from WP:MEAT: A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, may be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that editing doesn´t mean you can do as you please. I edit pages where false narratives are written. if I gave a citation that did not include Gambia as a country where the music genre is from this doesn't mean I'm targeting a specific country. There are several members on this website who are only interested in a certain subject or demographic. they only edit articles about that subject. I'm not the only one.first edit happened to be that article because I was searching something on a search engine Cam5643 (talk) 22:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "false narrative" you speak of was reliably sourced. You don't get to delete that simply be declaring it to be false. For the last time, if you're only here to argue about whether or not things originated in Senegal, there's no reason to unblock you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

not true, there was no citation regarding the country of origin so I added one that you deleted because it doesn´t suit you. the source was a book from an oxford author. The piece of work itself (the article, book) is reliable according to Wikipedia Wikipedia:Reliable sources . Also I´m not here arguing about a specific country. You are the only one who is arguing about countries I just answered to your questions, and I honestly can´t understand why you are lying by accusing me of deleting citations whebn in fact I added them while you are intentionaly deleting them. It can be all verified so why are you lying Cam5643 (talk) 00:26, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) While I was mistaken that you removed a citation (the blocked editor who made similar edits immediately preceding yours did), you did remove "Gambia" as did the previous editor. I've restored your source along with numerous other sources which describe the Wolof/Senegambian origins of the genre. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:MZMcBride , User:Explicit,User:Fastily, User:RHaworth, User:Liz, User:NawlinWiki, User:Magog the Ogre, User:East718 I edited an article with citation, the admninstrator @Ohnoitsjamie removed the citation and blocked my account. Now after he added my citation back he is accusing me of removing them although it was him who removed them. This can easily be verified with edit history. Also, he completely blocked my account so that I can´t make a request for arbitration although he is pretending the opposite. I request your mediation. Cam5643 (talk) 03:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were not mistaken. you are saying this now because with the edit history one can see that you deleted my citation, which according to you is not reliable, although the citation is from oxford. Cam5643 (talk) 03:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barkeep49 User:Beeblebrox User:Cabayi User:CaptainEek User:Enterprisey I can´t make a request since @Ohnoitsjamie blocked that option. He is re-adding citation I first added and removed by him pretending now it was a mistake. He is blocking me from editing for no reason while he is adding and removing what pleases him. Cam5643 (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have given a detailed explanation. OhNoitsJamie Talk is unable to refute me other than making baseless accusations and weak arguments. account has been completly blocked with no possibility request a dispute resolution by OhNoitsJamie Talk .

You need only have one unblock request open at a time. Please read WP:GAB. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Where can I request arvbritration? you blocked this account so that I cant request an abritation otherwise I would have no reason to ask you. Cam5643 (talk) 03:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you've read WP:GAB: Administrators are volunteers. Be patient. Any review will be carried out by an administrator other than the one who blocked you. (emphasis mine). Pinging every user you can think of is probably not the soundest strategy. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That´s fine with me. Hopefully you will from now on stop with your fraudulent pratices. Cam5643 (talk) 03:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I´m just pinging them sincce I have no other possiblities you blocked my account. Cam5643 (talk) 03:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to ping anyone. The unblock template adds an entry here. Good luck. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i´am requesting for arbritation not an unblock. Where can I do this since you blocked the account? Please answer. Cam5643 (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This appeal is not eligible for Arbitration Committee appeal, so you will need to stick with traditional unblock request methods. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That´s fine with me. Cam5643 (talk) 03:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page blanking[edit]

Per WP:BLANKING, while users are free to remove most content from their own talk page, they may not remove declined unblock requests on active blocks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]