User talk:Cameron Cunningham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Cameron Cunningham. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 14:49, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 00:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Maitland group, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fiduciary Institute of Southern Africa logo.gif missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Admiral Administration (February 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Admiral Administration (March 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Makro (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Admiral Administration was accepted[edit]

Admiral Administration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JDgeek1729 (talk) 01:31, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

{{help me}}

Help me with...

Hi

I submitted an article about 2 weeks ago and at the time it said there were only about 700 people ahead of me to review. Now that number has more than doubled and my article still hasn't been assessed. Any chance you can help? It's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Beneficiary_fund

Many thanks Cameron


Cameron Cunningham (talk) 10:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yours is 15 days old. This page will give you an idea of the queue Category:AfC_pending_submissions_by_age  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Beneficiary fund was accepted[edit]

Beneficiary fund, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 14:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:54, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Fairheads Benefit Services[edit]

Hello, Cameron Cunningham,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Fairheads Benefit Services should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairheads Benefit Services .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 11:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:57, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland[edit]

Hello Cameron Cunningham. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Maitland".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairheads Benefit Services (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairheads Benefit Services (January 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samuell1616 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. One life to live (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Cameron Cunningham, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! One life to live (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Nils Bergman (February 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
He's probably notable, but the article reads too much like an advertisement for his theories. Try rewriting without adjectives of praise, or vague statements like " He has given keynote addresses on KMC at International Conferences"

In addition some of it was taken from http://www.kangaroomothercare.com/about.aspx, and the rest reads pretty much as if it also was taken from published sources. this is not permitted without explicit donation of the material under a free license according to the details at WP:DCM. It's better to rewrite, and produces a more encyclopedic tone.

Make sure all references show the author, title, name of publication and date, as well as the link. Remember that you can not prove the acceptance or notability of the method bylines to his own publications.
You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 01:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nils Bergman has been accepted[edit]

Nils Bergman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 17:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Nils Bergman.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nils Bergman.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skin-to-skin contact has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skin-to-skin contact. Thanks! Primefac (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skin-to-skin contact (February 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:
Could very well be a notable subject for an article, but could you deal with the missing WP:LEAD and the citations, please?
You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. -- Sam Sing! 12:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kangaroo Mother Care (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kangaroo care instead.
You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. -- Sam Sing! 10:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skin-to-skin contact (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kangaroo care instead.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Warning icon Please be aware that if you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I also remind you of our our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure DGG ( talk ) 05:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maitland Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skin-to-skin contact (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kangaroo care instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 13:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fairheads Benefit Services concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fairheads Benefit Services, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fairheads Benefit Services[edit]

Hello, Cameron Cunningham. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Fairheads Benefit Services".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kangaroo Mother Care[edit]

Hello, Cameron Cunningham. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kangaroo Mother Care".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Skin-to-skin contact concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Skin-to-skin contact, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Skin-to-skin contact[edit]

Hello, Cameron Cunningham. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Skin-to-skin contact".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar {t} 18:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fiduciary Institute of Southern Africa logo.gif[edit]

Notice

The file File:Fiduciary Institute of Southern Africa logo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:41, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beneficiary fund, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Forbes. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cameron_Cunningham&oldid=1145828402"