User talk:Carinarampelt

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Carinarampelt! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:27, Wednesday, April 8, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
4	Essingen (Württemberg) (talk)	Add sources
451	German Peasants' War (talk)	Add sources
27	Upper Swabia (talk)	Add sources
1,840	Baden-Württemberg (talk)	Add sources
5	Eschach, Germany (talk)	Add sources
194	Raetia (talk)	Add sources
23	Ulrich, Duke of Württemberg (talk)	Cleanup
99	Heidenheim an der Brenz (talk)	Cleanup
17	Roman Catholic Diocese of Passau (talk)	Cleanup
5	Iggingen (talk)	Expand
4	Durlangen (talk)	Expand
7	Plüderhausen (talk)	Expand
179	Consequences of Nazism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
249	Crime in Germany (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
44	Rheinfelden (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
30	Catholic lay organisations (talk)	Merge
60	Diversity in early Christian theology (talk)	Merge
62	Christianity in the ante-Nicene period (talk)	Merge
39	Garrison Church (Potsdam) (talk)	Wikify
48	Federal budget of Germany (talk)	Wikify
370	Catholic Church and Nazi Germany (talk)	Wikify
6	Ochsenberg (Swabian Jura) (talk)	Orphan
2	Suitbert Bäumer (talk)	Orphan
2	Barulaganye Bolofete (talk)	Orphan
5	Böbingen an der Rems (talk)	Stub
3	Obergröningen (talk)	Stub
4	Täferrot (talk)	Stub
4	Hüttlingen, Baden-Württemberg (talk)	Stub
4	Mögglingen (talk)	Stub
5	Unterschneidheim (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Isabella Fenwick has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Isabella Fenwick. Thanks! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:19, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, I really appreciate it!

--Carinarampelt (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

So would you consider her historical like Héloïse? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure what you mean, but I think of her as an important influence on a key Romantic poet (and a woman's contribution that often gets overlooked). --Carinarampelt (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heloise and Abelard are famous because of a series of letters they wrote between themselves. They did have some other titles like Abbott and Abbess but instead of them being linked together we have separate articles. I started a post here [[1]]. This should be a great resource for us both. I want to get a little more input first. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:39, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense! Yeah, would love to have more input on this. I want to make sure I'm giving credit where credit is due—but if her notability is entirely dependent on Wordsworth, maybe it does make more sense to put her there. --Carinarampelt (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ladies @ Women in Red agreed and moved your article to mainspace. Congratulations! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! Thank you so much for your help! :) --Carinarampelt (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isabella Fenwick[edit]

Hola, Carinarampelt!

I am also a new editor. I just had a look at your article. I think it is great. Loved the writing. Though I did scratch my head about the way you used the word "scribe" in the first paragraph. Is that how W referred to her? I am sure more experienced editors than I will pass through and let you know about conformity (or not!) to WP style.

If I have any advice (as a fellow "young" editor), it's that working here is not about any specific piece of info, it's about... getting the info out there. I've had a few articles cut down in size. At first that was a shock, but really it's no big deal. The important bits can get added back in later... if they are really that important.

In any case, nice read, and hits a sweet spot for me for sure, as it is an area that I knew something about previously. But somehow missed Fenwick! -Katya Sicklemoon (talk) 16:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. As for notability, isn't it fair to say that Wordsworth's is almost entirely dependent on the women in his life, as well as the other way around? (Heh, not 100% serious, but all those raids of D's notebooks!)

Hey Katya/Sicklemoon! Thanks so much for your kind words! That's a good point—I admit I didn't give the word much thought (it's not one that Wordsworth used, as far as I'm aware). Do you have an alternative suggestion? Maybe "transcriber"?

Definitely! It's my first article so this is so new. It's hard to give up control when it's something you care about, but it's good to have others' eyes on it to help keep you objective. I'm really coming to appreciate the community as I get more involved :)

Hahaha—that's so true, especially for Dorothy. I'm glad the women in his life are finally getting the recognition they deserve! -Carina --Carinarampelt (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Amy Gottlieb, from its old location at User:Carinarampelt/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful, thanks so much! --Carinarampelt (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020 GOCE drive bling[edit]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Carinarampelt for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2020 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk (talk) 02:47, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Gottlieb has been accepted[edit]

Amy Gottlieb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 00:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]