User talk:Carjam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Carjam[edit]

A tag has been placed on Carjam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 09:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest note[edit]

By your user name, it appears that you represent a company or organization. Please read our conflict of interest guidelines. We welcome your contributions here, but please refrain from writing about your own company's services and personnel, as you did in Carjam. Thanks, and happy editing! AKRadeckiSpeaketh 02:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I understand but as you are listing another business with a similar model (Carfax Inc.) I wonder what they did differently?
(copied from my talk page, since you posted the same there) I believe Carfax (company) is the article you're referring to? If so, notice two things: 1) it wasn't written by a representative of that company, and 2) notability has been established in detail by multiple references to major media coverage. Your article achieved neither. Addressing the refs in particular: I checked all three as you listed them, the first two said nothing about carjam, the third is a forum and is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia purposes. If your company is truly notable in an encyclopedic sense, let the major media cover you, and when it does, then one of our editors who's not connected with the company will write about it here. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 23:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]