User talk:CarlosTankEngineBoi

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

January 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm DprPrplr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to BabyFirst have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. DprPrplr (talk) 06:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DprPrplr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to BabyTV have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Changing names of pages to other languages from English makes it less accessible to users of the English Wikipedia. DprPrplr (talk) 06:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at BabyFirst. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 04:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at BabyFirst, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 04:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Language Names on BabyFirst[edit]

Hello and Happy New Year! Thanks so much for your edits. Just hopping by to say that language names are always left in English on the English Wikipedia, just for readability. If you have any questions, we can discuss it here or on the article's talk page. Thanks! Double Plus Ungood (talk) 06:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 03:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Lard Almighty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kmart have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Lard Almighty (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kmart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 06:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please stop over-describing channel feeds. Currently it's completely superfluous to describe HD/SD feeds, as outside a very few channels most networks and providers have now made the change. These edits have been reverted and you're again asked to understand why you keep being warned. Nate • (chatter) 23:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I plan to change the Cartoon Network HD part, can I at least put this:

Cartoon Network HD is the high definition simulcast feed of Cartoon Network that broadcasts in the 1080i resolution format and is available to nearly all providers. The high-definition feed was launched on October 15, 2007. As of 2013, the HD logo utilizes the same logo as the SD feed, retiring the logo that has been used on the HD feed. Many subscription providers carry the high definition feed and downscale it for the standard definition feed. CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 04:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's just a logo most viewers usually tune out, and the date of the switchover is unsourced and completely unimportant. We're not Logopedia. Nate • (chatter) 20:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about this:

Cartoon Network HD is the high definition simulcast feed of Cartoon Network that broadcasts in the 1080i resolution format and is available to nearly all providers. The high-definition feed was launched on October 15, 2007. As of 2013, the HD logo utilizes the same logo as the SD feed. Many subscription providers carry the high definition feed and downscale it for the standard definition feed.

Or what can I put? CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 02:14, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kmart. Aoidh (talk) 06:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For how long! CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 08:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You put in indefinitely, so forever. I guess. CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 04:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 04:20, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am leaving forever so none of his ever happens again. You should tell everyone else. Hope you’re all happy. CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 04:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t accept any of my appeals because all I will be doing is more trouble in Wikipedia. CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 04:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I use Flickr for sourcing, because I want to try to source about a Super Kmart at 215,000 square feet, which was located at Euclid, Ohio, and was the largest Super Kmart. If yes, can I use this link:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/131637499@N06/24808989197

CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 23:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CarlosTankEngineBoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I know what I did wrong, but I might be able to do better if I am unblocked. If I put in something, it must be sourced. Or else, it might get removed. So if I am unblocked, I hope I have understood why I got blocked and that I learned my lesson to make sure I don’t do this again. If I do something wrong, I will let you block me permanently, and I will let you not take any appeals from me if I get permanently blocked.

Decline reason:

So you changed your mind about leaving forever? What changed within the five minutes it took you to change your mind? Please give an example of a sourced edit you would make. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can I use Flickr for sourcing, because I wanna try to source about a Super Kmart at 215,000 square feet, which was located at Euclid, Ohio, and was the largest Super Kmart. If yes, can I use this link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131637499@N06/24808989197

CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 09:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CarlosTankEngineBoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here: I can try to source about the Kmart in Euclid Ohio being the largest Super Kmart. If I can, maybe this helps: https://www.flickr.com/photos/13878970@N06/23480852703

Decline reason:

I apologize - but I tend to try to take people at their word. This is far too recent for me to unblock you. I would suggest you hold off on trying again (and this includes trying to create other accounts, and I'm not saying you have, just avoid that temptation) for a minimum of six months after having read the guide to appealing blocks.

Be ready to explain what went wrong, and specifically what you will do differently to not be disruptive. SQL ^{Query Me!} 03:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to the reviewing admin - Please see this diff which was made after being blocked. - Aoidh (talk) 01:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks anyway. 20:51, 9 July 2022 CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) (UTC)

I'd be fine with anyone replacing my indefinite block by one that automatically expires after a year or two but can't be appealed in the meantime. There's no hope for an earlier unblock. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, no CarlosTankEngineBoi (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]