User talk:CarmelitaCharm
Welcome!
Hello, CarmelitaCharm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!
If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page
Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 12:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi there! I stumbled into a bit of redundancy and confusion which you're involved with at Gemini, and you may wish to check talk:Gemini and see if we can sort it all out. Cheers! JFMorse 09:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
References on Fixed Sign and Fire Sign[edit]
Hey, I'm not sure how much work it would be to find a professional looking web site that talks about the various triplicities and quadruplicities of the zodiac, but I noticed that you seemed to be doing a bit of editing on the zodiac pages, and was wondering if you knew where to find a good one. Wikipedia articles need some form of reference to establish verifiability and no original research, and, unfortunately, I know very little about the zodiac. --Todd(Talk-Contribs) 09:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Edits on Fashion design[edit]
In case you are wondering why I keep changing your edits to this article, there are two reasons. First, it isn't necessary to link to the same article over and over again; one link in an article or section is enough. Second, when you use the word "American" to mean United States, please write the link as [[United States|American]] so that your readers get to the correct article. As you can see at American, that word can refer to many other things besides the United States. --Russ Blau (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Disambiguation[edit]
Hello, you made Sagittarius a disambiguation page, and now there are around 337 links to the disambiguation page. As per Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links, there should be no links to disambiguation pages. Given that the number of links to disambiguation pages is growing, and becoming a bigger problem could you please try to disambiguate the links to one of the options on that page. Regards. -- Jeff3000 14:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Fashions_of_the_Seventies.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Fashions_of_the_Seventies.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Haute couture[edit]
Carmelita, we can't use material that is just cut and pasted from other websites. You added a large chunk of material from [1] to the Haute couture article. I have reverted to the previous version.
If that material is to be used, it is going to have to be rephrased, re-organized, and credited to the source. Zora 19:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Carmelita, if you keep restoring copyright violations, you will get in trouble. We are really really serious about copyvios here. I know it's a copyvio because I found it googling for a chunk of text from the version you posted. Your text is identical to the toffsworld text (which may itself be copied from another site.) If you had translated it from the French yourself, and rearranged, the wording would not be identical.
- The material can be included if it is rewritten completely and referenced to the toffsworld source. That means breaking it up. You included material in "production process" that is not about production, but about revenues, numbers of employees, etc. Zora 10:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
DYK[edit]
|
On November 29, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Plant perception, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Well done. You've earnt yourself the top spot on this DYK update. Thanks for your contributions. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Want to join the Fashion Wiki Project?[edit]
|
Hello, CarmelitaCharm and thank you for your contributions on articles related to fashion. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Fashion, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of fashion and related articles on Wikipedia.
If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Sara.g.goldstein 08:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC) |
Survey[edit]
Hi CarmelitaCharm!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 04:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi CarmelitaCharm! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]
| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi CarmelitaCharm! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)