User talk:Carmol Santiago
February 2018[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
List of Ring characters[edit]
@NinjaRobotPirate: Alright, honestly, what problem do you have with this page? The only reason you gave for reversion was "revert sock". Can't you see I've changed? I've tried to make that abundantly clear over the past six months. Originally I didn't read any of the Wikipedia rules, and didn't know that you weren't supposed to have more than one account. But I never used my accounts abusively! Every edit I've made to Wikipedia has been made in Wikipedia's best interests. Could you please inform as to how I can go about proving that I am a suitable user of Wikipedia and stop having my account deleted? Thank you for your time.
- Also, have to say this again: I honestly have no idea who User:GolfingIreland is. That account was never mine.
Carmol Santiago (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- I haven't seen the checkuser data, but, for what it's worth, I agree that GolfingIreland doesn't look like one of your accounts. If you want to edit Wikipedia again, the way forward would be to request an unblock from User:TotalTruthTeller24. It would probably be declined right now, though, since you've been socking so much. The standard offer would probably be your best bet. If you followed through with that, I'd be willing to support an unblock in the resulting discussion. Creating more sock puppets, though, means that I'll probably run through your edits and revert them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Alright, sounds reasonable. Though could you re-edit a version of my edits from List of Ring characters and List of Cloverfield characters? I don't see any way those edits were harming the page. Carmol Santiago (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- @NinjaRobotPirate: I wasn't avoiding the sock at Alien (franchise) or Blade Runner (franchise); those were fully intended as my final edits before going for the standard offer: waiting for six months from today. Thank you. Carmol Santiago (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)