User talk:CastAStone/2005

Your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Atlantic hurricane season[edit]

Hi, I just noticed your vote here, and thought that you might want to check to see if you made a mistake in it. No pressure to change it, just a heads-up. --Apyule 07:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenore Schneider[edit]

you voted "should be Merged into Advanced Placement Program" then "then Delete this after merging". Please note that that isn't possible, if the article is merged then it has to be kept for copyright reasons (see Wikipedia:Guide to deletion). Mozzerati 20:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up!--CastAStone|^(talk) 19:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per Strömberg / Ulf Axelson[edit]

As much as I wish I could agree with you that they deserve a speedy delete, those two articles don't. Assertion of being a professor is enough to avoid a speedy delete, and force the issue to AfD land. I don't like it, but the consensus reached was that there are enough professors that are notable that they shouldn't be speedily deleted. Caerwine 06:00, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In case you haven't seen it, this discussion is going on at The College of Wooster Greeks:

Merge[edit]

I see no reason not to merge this with The College of Wooster. All the unverifiable stuff should be left behind, though. I know the article claims references, but I strongly suspect much of what's here isn't verifiable. Friday (talk) 02:06, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would not pitch hell about a merge, but nothing in here is unverifiable - it's all stuff, from my understanding, that was referenced in the Special Collections library at Wooster. Phil Sandifer 02:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I too would be okay with a merge (though I don't see why it can't stay here). However, I was originally the person to get User:CastAStone to add sources; I believe it's all okay now. I will add this thread to his talk page, and maybe he can clarify further. Jacqui ^★ 03:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Map (hopefully) revised[edit]

I updated the Abortion Laws of the World map as per your request. I hope that the new colour scheme will make it clearer to those with a red-green colour deficit. Sorry for the delay. Thanks. -Kyd 12:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]