User talk:Catholic from Berlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop vandalising the article about Lea Rosh. The facts in question have long been settled on both Talk:Lea Rosh and de:Diskussion:Lea Rosh. Unless you can provide other evidence then the sources cited there, every change you make will be considered vandalism. --FordPrefect42 13:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Every change you make will be considered vandalism. Reference to a different project is irrelevant. It is not proven her birth name is Rosh here, in fact multiple sources disagree and state her birth name to be Rohs, which also seems to be correct. Rosh is not a German spelling. Catholic from Berlin 13:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then please cite your "multiple sources". The sources cited in Talk:Lea Rosh#Names are sufficient to prove that you are wrong. BTW, in Talk:Lea Rosh#JEW you are refencing a different project yourself (i.e. de:Lea Rosh). --FordPrefect42 14:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism[edit]

Please do not use Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism as a forum for your content dispute. Please use the articles talk page to try to reach consensus. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your 3RR report[edit]

Catholic from Berlin, I have reviewed your report of FordPrefect42 for 3RR. Under Wikipedia policy for biographies of living people, all negative, unsourced material about living people are to be removed immediately and such removals are exempt from 3RR. I believe the edits being reverted were indeed negative and unsourced, therefore, I have chosen to take no action against FordPrefect. Please ensure your edits to Wikipedia are properly sourced per verifiability and reliable sources. Please stop edit warring and use the talk pages to discuss the article. If you cannot reach agreement, you may make use of Wikipedia's dispute resolution options. But edit warring is not the way to go and will only end up with you being blocked. Thanks, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 15:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]