User talk:Catxx

Archived Talk

Hi Catxx and welcome to the Horse Breeds task force! Thanks for your work on the horse breed articles. We definitely need those infoboxes put on all the articles that don't have them and I for one appreciate your work. A couple of things you may want to know about, however. One ongoing thing, constantly debated (though not for the last year or so), is the issue of wikipedia capitalization conventions versus proper name conventions. Most of the pony breeds we deliberately chose to capitalize as "XYZ pony" instead of "XYZ Pony" because wikipedia won't always find the article if a user forgets the capitalization (and it's a pain to create redirects for a zillion articles.) Anyway, if you don't mind, it may be wise NOT to change the capitalization on these unless there is a really special reason to. An example of a special reason was American Quarter Horse when that is the full breed name (No one calls them "Quarters!" LOL!) there was actually a minor edit war over that one a couple years ago! But generally, it's better NOT to capitalize the second word, but if you think there's a good reason to, feel free to take it either to the talk page of the article or to wikiproject equine (WP:EQUINE) Basically, I am of mixed feelings on the topic personally, and the article naming is inconsistent (we have about 350-400 breed articles here) so it's not a moral issue to me, but you may want to seek some consensus before changing 100 articles that someone else will want to revert. Montanabw^(talk) 23:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi again Catxx. Yeah, I know about the capitalization thing. As long as the redirects work if someone just types in the name without capitals. The software is fussy. I would ask that you do be aware of two things: 1) I originally put that template into all the horse breed articles. Then, 2) just a few months ago, we had a fairly substantial edit war with an editor who unilaterally went in and REMOVED the equine template from all the breed articles (which was a side effect of a rather nasty edit war over templates in general). Now that you are putting them all back, don't be surprised if this other editor shows up and expresses outrage (I personally wanted to keep the template there, so I am OK with your work here, but heads up that it may reawaken another round of this...other than the two main combatants, the other equine editors have opinions, but not strongly held ones).

The other thing is if you could leave clearer edit summaries so I know when you have just added the template and/or infobox and when you have made more substantive edits or added photos...as it is, I have to open and check all articles you have edited to see what's happened. Most of it is really good, but a couple of minor things had to be tweaked (the photo in Lipizzan, the caption at Chincoteague Pony, etc...), you are doing such a great job that I haven't had to do much, but a good edit summary sure helps. I have tried to leave edit summaries when I did tweak something of yours, hope they are clear. If you need anything at all, please do not hesitate to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at WikiProject Equine or at the talk page of a particular article. There are about 3 or 4 real active editors on the horse articles and we would all be glad to assist. Also be aware that there are a couple of articles that are real "fragile" in that they either reflect a delicately negotiated edit war truce, or are subject to some ongoing spats and too dramatic an edit could cause an upset, so please don't fret if we tweak some of what you do. Fortunately the biggest spat right now is in the horse racing articles over whether Australia or New Zealand claims certain famous horses, and I, luckily, am not involved in that one! LOL! Anyway, just another thanks for all the cleanup you are doing and it is MUCH appreciated! Montanabw^(talk) 02:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

You don't give a poop? Does that mean we can give you sh**? (grin). Just PLEASE be here for us the next time someone goes back into all 350+ breed articles and wants the template out, OK? Montanabw^(talk) 23:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again and stuff

Just a quick thanks for all the much-needed work you are doing on the horse articles with the infoboxes and photos. It's a tremendous effort and much appreciated. An FYI, don't put a section at the top of the lead. Not sure what the deal is, probably has something to do with the sites that mirror to wiki and to search engine stuff, but the wikigods don't like the TOC to be first, they want an intro, THEN the first heading. It kind of makes sense, I think, but also one of those things that others care about greatly so best to just go along with it. You only did an initial header a couple times, so absolutely no big deal. (and usually indicative of a need for a stronger lead, but that's a different issue altogether) Also, if you put in a photo but are at a loss for a caption, leave a note in the edit summary to alert others that we need to come up with one. It is a delight that you are able to find so many images, also. Thanks again! Montanabw^(talk) 04:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm groovy with it in collapsed state. Should you wonder why I act so dicey, see here. I lost that round, when the one person behind that spat went in and unilaterally removed all the templates (that I had originally put in). I'm sure she will be back, eventually. Montanabw^(talk) 18:04, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

October 2010

In a recent edit to the page Domestic rabbit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. me_and 20:06, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Sket One

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sket One, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sket-one.com/about.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sket One

A tag has been placed on Sket One, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sket One, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Kinu ^t/_c 18:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Sket One

In case you didn't see my reply, I've restored the article and moved it to Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Sket One so that you and others can improve it. My reasons for doing so are on my talk page. If you have questions or concerns, please address them on my talk page, thanks! -- Atama頭 20:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

I forgot to add, please please please consider what is written at our Conflict of Interest guideline. Most especially WP:LUC and this section. Editing an article on behalf of the subject is very much frowned upon. -- Atama頭 20:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Florida White Rabbit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARBA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited Gabali rabbit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agouti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Sport horse infobox

Curious what's up with the new sport horse infobox, we have a named horse infobox already, curious why the change, particularly with different parameters. Montanabw^(talk) 22:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Sandbox

If you feel the need to delete my Sandbox can you offer me a reason?--Egghead06 (talk) 07:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Catxx. You have new messages at Montanabw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BTW, thanks for popping in infoboxes in the articles where they are lacking. Should you come across any good source material on these breeds, feel free to either pop the URL into the Extermal Links or talk page, or borrow from some of our other shorter articles Kentucky Mountain Saddle Horse just went up for GAN and is a shorter article) for style and content. Montanabw^(talk) 19:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silvana*HDC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KWPN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Catxx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Caldes Rabbit line info

	Caldes rabbit line
	Hello Thank you for include this info about caldes line. We work with this line and would like to get in direct contact with you. Can we do so by email? Juan.p.sanchez (talk) 08:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://edch.org.uk/, https://m.facebook.com/pg/EdinDogCatHome/about/, and https://edch.org.uk/about/our-vision-and-mission/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Wow how about giving me a chance to amend the wording first, geez. --Catxx (talk) 08:21, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 09:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Society for Abandoned Animals moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Society for Abandoned Animals, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 09:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Abandoned Animals (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Society for Abandoned Animals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Society for Abandoned Animals, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Catxx! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EDCH Rescue Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EDCH Rescue Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Society for Abandoned Animals Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Society for Abandoned Animals Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Society for Abandoned Animals has been accepted

Society for Abandoned Animals, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rabbit Welfare Association Logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rabbit Welfare Association Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home

Hello, Catxx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home

Hello, Catxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edinburgh Dog and Cat Home".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund

Hello, Catxx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund

Hello, Catxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wood Green Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wood Green Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 11:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mayhew Animal Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mayhew Animal Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of British Giant rabbit

The article British Giant rabbit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability, not recognised with British Rabbit Council, ARBA, or NZ Rabbit Council, can't find any source able to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)