User talk:Cavaliere grande

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cavaliere grande, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Alexmar983 (talk) 11:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sophie Hoechstetter[edit]

Hi, this source for Hoechstetter says 1878 as date of birth. Misprint? Blythwood (talk) 12:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blythwood: The German Wikipedia, the German Digital Library, the German National Library, this source and this source say 1873.--Cavaliere grande (talk) 12:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Might also be worth clarifying that she didn't die at Dachau concentration camp, as given the date and location that was what I immediately assumed. Blythwood (talk) 12:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, this source says 1878, but that could be copying the same mistake. She might even have lied about her age... Blythwood (talk) 12:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can be possible. So I really know nothing about it.--Cavaliere grande (talk) 13:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Reinecke for deletion[edit]

This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article Paul Reinecke is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Reinecke until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! Yashovardhan (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cavaliere grande, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Anton Fahne have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. MassiveYR ♠ 08:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Anton Fahne) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Anton Fahne, Cavaliere grande!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time to create this. It has been tagged as unreferenced. I was going to change this, but it doesn't say that the external link given is your source. If it is, can you please put it inline, or let me know and I can. Thanks again.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Engelbert Sonneborn for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Engelbert Sonneborn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engelbert Sonneborn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING[edit]

You have continued to create unreferenced/unclearly referenced articles on living people, despite previous messages, suchas at Wolfgang Freyberg. Please stop and go back and add your source. If you have any questions, please ping me. Boleyn (talk) 11:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you have continued to create dodgy articles, I have moved Thomas Philipp to draftspace. Please stop and reference properly the articles you have created. Boleyn (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Marie-Luise Heckmann) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Marie-Luise Heckmann, Cavaliere grande!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

YOu have continued to edit Wikipedia but have not addressed the serious concerns brought to your attention. We cannot have articles no living people with no sources. This has no sources; external links are usuallu 'friendly suggestions', but if these are actually your sources, please correct the heading and WP:INLINECITE. Inline citations are far easier for the reader and are required for biographies of living people. FOr the moment, I am moving this to Draft:Marie-Luise Heckmann. Please work on it there, and when it is sourced, move it back. However, it shows absolutely no indication of why she is notable. Please see WP:PROF and WP:GNG, as well as WP:RS, WP:INLINECITE and WP:Communication is required.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolfgang Kosack[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wolfgang Kosack, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 13:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:ACADEMIC, or WP:NAUTHOR. No evidence of any heavy citing of his work at [[1]], or of other significant coverage. The only reference in the article uses him in one footnote about one minor point. Even in de:Wolfgang Kosack (robotranslation), the claims don't support notability (no coverage of Japanische Manga - Love Story or Die Mänlichen Krefte der Liebe; one 3 month exhibition at Bonn Egyptian Museum (note total 3000 objects) from his donated collection without apparently significant coverage). No permission to restore sought or granted at WP:DRV. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~

Your draft article, Draft:Marie-Luise Heckmann[edit]

Hello, Cavaliere grande. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marie-Luise Heckmann".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Magenta moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Hallo Magenta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hug^syrup 10:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hallo Magenta (September 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia isn't for announcing product launches. Needs external sources that critique the product.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hallo Magenta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hallo Magenta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cavaliere grande! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:19, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hallo Magenta (November 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hallo Magenta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hallo Magenta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 20:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hallo Magenta concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hallo Magenta, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hallo Magenta[edit]

Hello, Cavaliere grande. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hallo Magenta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsberg am Brombachsee moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ramsberg am Brombachsee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramsberg am Brombachsee (January 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability per WP:NPLACE, and the sources are insufficient to satisfy WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramsberg am Brombachsee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]