User talk:Cdeujm

"(AA announced routes to Asia.9 Boeings 747: 3 747-400 and 6 747-200.Routes to China, Thailand and Japan were announced.Search on Google Mal Karma!!)"

Please provide an actual URL from a Wikipedia:Reliable source. That way your claims will be verified. The person posting information is required to provide an exact link to reliable sources. WhisperToMe 06:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I don't know who you are, but you are maliciously making that crap up. We never announced anything. Maybe you are confusing AR with AA? or doing some wishful thinking? you are only (slightly) correct about the 6 742s, the tricky part is, only one is operational and flies not more than once a week to MAD Mal karma 06:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see no link. Just give it to me instead of telling me to search for it. Trust me, if we were going to fly to Asia, LAX, Lisbon, Jupiter, I'd kknow it! Mal karma 01:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT! that 'news' is more than two years old. Besides, the flight to China a) was operated by Air Comet, and it wasn't even a codeshare! and b) is DISCONTINUED. It lasted for a few months and then it dissapeared. You are insane. Or maybe your Spanish is lacking as it clearly says that they are PLANNING flights to Bangkok and Tokyo and the flights from MAD to Asia were going to be on A7s metal. You even went as far as giving the first day ofoperations. Oh, SA is not flying to EZE, they were going to fly thrice weekly by this time of the year, but that didn't happen. I don't know why.

You should seriously be banned from ever touching that article again.

PS: don't tell anybody, but I've worked in AR's for 3 years already, shhh! Mal karma 04:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I said I've been in AR for 3 years; how can I be involved with the gremios? the big guys handle the big decisions. And I don't like them too much either. So keep them out of the discusion, I do my job and do it well and more often than not find some actions from boht the workers and the company despicable.

Seeing once a plane of SA in EZE doesn't mean they fly regularly. When did you see it? how many times? you are unable to find a proof about anything. The plane could've been there for any reason, like a diversion from GRU, a charter, a government official visit. SA doesn't fly to EZE, period.

PS: AA is American Airlines. Shows just how much you know of aviation, you can't even get a simple code correctly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mal karma (talk • contribs) 04:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, no harm done. I just get a little touchy when it involves the company and simply wanted to have the fleet/destinations info right. Mal karma 03:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and no: Yes, 70 something Airbus have been ordered, but no, all orders are by Marsans (I made it clear at the fleet information). That was not nitpicking, as it means that any of those aircraft may come to AR or not, Marsans has two more airlines and owns a leasing company. So if Marsans leaves, like many people say and want, then I don't think we'll see those planes in AR.

But anyway fleet is the lesser of our councerns right now, or it should be, just today a study in a newspaper (Ido't know if you're in Argentina) says that we're the 5fth less punctual airline in a group of 90 companies. And it's probably true. Mal karma 15:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No sé, costumbre? aparte no sabía de donde eras.

Lo de los vuelos debe ser un codeshare. No estoy seguro, pero posiblemente hagan San Pablo-Buenos Aires en un vuelo de TAM. SAA seguro que no vuela con su propio metal a EZE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mal karma (talk • contribs) 04:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alguna vez se volí, allí y a muchas otras partes. Pero nada ahora, ni en código compartido. No hay ninguna ruta anunciada y ni siquiera seriamente planeada. Obviamente que no estamos en condiciones de hacer nada hoy día. Y no, preguntá lo que gustes. Mal karma 03:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No trabajo en aeropuerto, digamos q trabajo en atención al público en sucursal. Mal karma 15:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No vuelan, me olvidé de fijarme, pero casi seguro es código compartido con otra aerolínea (TAM seguramente). No ordenó AR ni Marsans ningún avión de Boeing, solo Airbus. El que puso eso está haciendo bardo al pedo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mal karma (talk • contribs) 02:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eso, o el diario saca info errónea y vieja (SAA había planeado volar 3 veces x semana para octubre creo, y al final quedó en la nada). Mal karma 21:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 21:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

En internacional no anda tan mal como parece, pero hay dos o tres vuelos por semana con algún problema, alguna demora grave. Lo de los pilotos es para cualquier vuelo, de cabotaje o internacional. Ahí la puntualidad sube y baja, no como en vuelos nacionales que siempre es bastante baja.Los ultimos dias, yo diria q la puntualidad subio al 60 por ciento, claro, con muchos vuelos menos. Y no hay ningún destino anunciado ni creo que haya algo seriamente planeado. Si entran aviones nuevos, posiblemente Paris non stop - en lugar de c/s con Air Comet - o Los Angeles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mal karma (talk • contribs) 22:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seguramente, aunque no me sorprendería que igual los alquilaran a AR. Pero no creo que se vaya, ni que se separen AR y AU, no le conviene a nadie. Pero lo que sí creo es que el gobierno va a aumentar la participación, no sé si eso es bueno o es malo. Mal karma 22:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Ministro Pistarini Airport[edit]

I have removed the flags you added because it was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive 3#User adding flags to destination lists and the consensus on it is to not include flags. But if you feel that it should be added, please bring it up on WP:Airports and get a consensus before adding. Thanks! Bucs2004 (talk) 17:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would second that. The consensus is to not include them but feel free to bring it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports. You should also look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags) especially Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags)#Accompany flags with country names. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, LAX is not direct (true it runs under the same flight number DL110)...you have to change planes at ATL. Bucs2004 (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]