Jump to content

User talk:Cdw1952/Talk Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cdw1952/Talk_Archive_1.

Welcome!

Hello, Cdw1952, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Tian Dayton, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb1 (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks[edit]

I knew someone you would be able to find sources. tedder (talk) 02:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NS logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NS logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bahia de Los Angeles[edit]

Your additions to the article on Bahia de los Angeles are very useful. I suggest that more be said about the community there, such as the americans who have contributed to the town and the history of the local citizens. 128.170.170.242(talk) 00:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Youth outcome questionnaire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 04:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You my friend are very quick to nominate pages for speedy deletion. I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 06:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Files in your User Space[edit]

Hey there Cdw1952, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you thatNon-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Cdw1952/userboxes/troubled teen. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I forgot that not everything in wikimedia is free. Live and learn. I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 04:44, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Young Adult Therapeutic Transition Program has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletionallows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 21:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Young Adult Therapeutic Transition Program, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Adult Therapeutic Transition Program. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Part Of

This article is part of a work-in-progress project on the troubled teen industry. It is essential in terms of defining all aspects of that project. Some of the other names for this type of program are Young Adult Program, Young Adult Transition Program and step down program. Young Adult Therapeutic Transition Program is the catch all name, the revised article will make this clear. Components of the TT industry are as follows:

Granted it needs work, I will address the notability issue, please be patient.I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

underlines[edit]

I like the underlines you added on DBT. Alatari (talk) 04:21, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Elan logo.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Elan logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add acopyright tag to the image description page.

Because you used a fair use rationale with your upload, the recommended copyright tag is {{non-free logo}}.Please add this to the image and remove the speedy delete template ({{di-no license}}).

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 12:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed that. I hope this does it.I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 03:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Naassmalllogo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naassmalllogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click[1] to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marymount College, Palos Verdes. Note that the three-revert ruleprohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is disingenuous to claim that the recent reversions were about deleting the properly sourced description of the college. A simple review of the history page will reveal the users Kellycurtis, 68.48.87.125 and Mccormick915 have all been intent on deleting the Expansion controversy section of the article. Even after attempts to engage them and changing the name to Expansion plans, the deletions continued. Toward the end the edits became more sophisticated but each time centered on deleting the expansion section. I suggest those three users, who have contributed to Marymount College, Palos Verdes and no other articles, have the same agenda and might be the same person masquerading as a sock puppet afteruser:Kellycurtis was blocked for vandalism.I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 02:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe I ever tried to identify your motives for reverting; as protecting admin, I have no opinion on whose edits are "right". However, please do not edit-war; use the talk page to reach a consensus. If the other users (whom I have also warned) refuse to discuss and continue to revert, then report them to WP:AN/I or WP:AN/EW. If you really believe that the other two users are sockpuppets (and have the evidence to substantiate the claim), then open a sockpuppet investigation.
Sorry, the disingenuous comment was not directed at you. It was in response to the 20:17, 31 August 2010 edit summary by user:Mccormick915. I apologize for the misunderstanding. A review of the talk page will show that I have tried to engage the others to no avail. I have requested page protection. I can't provide any evidence as to the sockpuppet comment, it's just that the user(s) actions seem to be coordinated.I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 02:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I know that dealing with tendentious editors can be a problem. If the revert-warring resumes, re-request at RFPP and I would be happy to reconsider. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jagged Edge (lifestyle), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top ofthe page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- mitchsurp -- (talk) 03:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jagged Edge (lifestyle) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is a lack of reliable sources to achieve notability here

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guerillero |My Talk 06:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jagged Edge (lifestyle) for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the articleJagged Edge (lifestyle), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in thedeletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagged Edge (lifestyle) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guerillero | My Talk 13:38, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NlaNClogo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:NlaNClogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recently you added this information to the George Washington article. Even though the information is interesting and could be important, the ahnentafel is completely unsourced and adds more content to an article that is already quite long in length. Please join the discussion about your edit at Talk:George Washington. Thank you, Shearonink (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My comments have been added to Talk:George Washington#George_Washington#Ancestry I (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig[edit]

I'd like to draw your attenton to WP:SIG, particularly the part which says

Signatures on Wikipedia identify you as a user and your contributions to Wikipedia. They encourage civility in discussions by identifying the author of a particular comment and the date and time at which it was made. Because of that, having an uncivil signature is strongly discouraged (in some cases, to the point of blocking the user until it is changed). In general anything that is not allowed in a user name should not be used in a signature either.

Your signature, the symbols of which I assume mean "I love music", do not identify you, which makes it difficult for other users, who have to click thorugh to your talk page to fin out your user name. Would you consider adding your user name to the sig, in the spirit of collegiality? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the phrase "identify you as a user and your contributions" is what it is all about not to identify a person by name. The point of having signatures is to be an alternate to the user name and does adequately identify the user. That being said I modified my signature to include my initials which should make it slightly easier for others to recognize my edits. Cheers. CDW ♥'s(talk)03:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that's very helpful. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Elan logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Elan logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sm school logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Sm school logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CEDU Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:CEDU Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Md MBA logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploadingFile:Md MBA logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Catchphrase#List of catchphrases[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Catchphrase#List of catchphrases. Elizium23 (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, did you go there? I am very familiar with a later version of the original program, and would be interested in finding reliable sources to back some things up. Contact me off-wiki through the e-mail feature if you want to! Cheers :> Doc talk 03:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doc, No I am a little older than that. I do however have a vested interest in Therapeutic Boarding Schools. I too am interested in finding reliable sources. BTW are you the Doc who authored the excellent article Adventure Therapy? -- Cdw ♥'s(talk) 04:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nope - that's a different "Doc". But I am formerly associated with one of the schools that was spawned from CEDU, and I know there's been a lot of bad press (of any press at all that can be found, really). I've found it hard to find any reliable sources backing up a lot of what's in the article, but since I've been "there", I know much of it to be true. Herein lies the problem with "verifiability, not truth" (it's a long story, trust me ;>). I've seen a good documentary on YouTube, but it's hardly a reliable source. Finding reliable sources will be a challenge, but one worth undertaking. Doc talk 04:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Do you care to say which school you were associated with? We might have something in common. -- Cdw ♥'s(talk) 04:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it wasn't in Idaho, and it wasn't in Italy. It wasn't in southern California, either ;> Doc talk 04:32, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't there one near Shasta for a short time? -- Cdw ♥'s(talk) 04:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cdw1952. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nomination of List of catchphrases for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of catchphrases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of catchphrases until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In List of idioms in the English language, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Bite the Dust(check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I believe the link is appropriate, "Bite the dust" is an idiom which is best defined by the ambiguous link.-- Cdw ♥'s(talk) 18:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]