User talk:Celtnorse

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Cupp computing. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cupp computing

A tag has been placed on Cupp computing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Cupp computing. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 23:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

My Position

I am trying to put some info up on CUPP Computing which is a company in Norway with some quite interesting technology. I didnt actually mean to post it as it was a work in progress. In the middle of editing using show changes I hit save. It might indeed have looked like ad copy because I took it right from the site at first. But I have edited that, and a lot of the background came from various tech sites like endgadget and whatnot, all of which I cited on the bottom. And now NONE of the text is cut and pasted. I have just been trying to edit it properly. I should indeed have used the sandbox... but now I am stuck... and its not right if it keeps getting blasted as a blatant advertisement and so on. Its not intended to be, and it shouldn't be seen as such. Frankly, there are any number of people who could write this for the company. I just wanted it here as a reference. The tech will pan out or not. If it does, it will be here in any case. Let me know what the deal is on that, because if it going to be a tug of war with wiki admin tossing big giant disclaimers on it, I would prefer it just go away. There is no hype in it. And I think the assessment of it as such now is untoward. I would just add this as well. The reason I even did this is was that it was suggested from among user comments within some of the articles referenced on the bottom of the page. If you want outside support for the relevance of the CUPP page, I would suggest a quick perusal of a few of those articles. But again, I stress, if we are going to be in tug of war about this page, then I heartily endorse its "speedy deletion" for now. I planned to refercne internally all the tech terms (like x-86, Chipset, RISC, CISC and so forth) to make it cool as a tech page. But I am not used to the format, and clearly that was going to take me HOURS. I also made a few errors, but this is not my gig as a rule. So I would prefer its either considered as reasonable as a valid reference before I put any more time into is, or it be made to go away with expeditious ferocity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupp_computing Celtnorse (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)