User talk:Chaimon

Copy of Talk Page for alternate User ID ChaiMontg[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, ChaiMontg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:46, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Thank you, I dream of horses!

You're welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help request[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I want to use a subsection of an existing article as a section in an article I'm writing. I used copy/past to get the text, and cited it with the {{

Main article: "article name"

}} thing no problem. BUT.... Is it possible to link to the subsection in the main article in such a way (some wikitext way) that will allow the section in my article to be updated automatically if it is changed in the main article?

Technically it's possible to do that, but I would strongly advise against it. You can easily "transclude" an entire article (categories, maintenance templates and all!) with this code: {{:Article title}} The colon here is important because otherwise the software would try to transclude a template, not an article, of that title. Now you could edit the article you want to transclude and enclose all its content except the section you want in <noinclude></noinclude> tags. But then what you display in your article may change at will if someone else edits the "source" article without realizing that doing so will affect other pages.

The standard approach is instead to duplicate the content - the focus of the coverage in the two articles may be different, and there's no reason to expect that we'll want to keep the sections in the two articles identical for all time. Huon (talk) 13:08, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Huon. You have put my mind at ease!

Hi ChaiMontg. I was coming her to say something similar to Huon, and agree with everything said. While I was looking at the draft and the section you copied and pasted, I noticed that you did so without providing mandatory copyright attribution. I've fixed this with a dummy edit providing the attribution in the edit summary. See here. Please note for future reference that when you copy from another article you must provide copyright attribution. The details are at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, and see especially the section from that page found through the shortcut WP:PATT. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Fuhghettaboutit. So much to learn! I'll do my best and read through the links you sent!

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2015 U.S. Oil Refinery Strike (March 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2015 U.S. Oil Refinery Strike and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Chaimon, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2015 U.S. Oil Refinery Strike concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2015 U.S. Oil Refinery Strike, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2015 U.S. Oil Refinery Strike[edit]

Hello, Chaimon. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "2015 U.S. Oil Refinery Strike".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hazard Pay has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hazard Pay. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hazard Pay has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hazard Pay. Thanks! Zanimum (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazard pay has been accepted[edit]

Hazard pay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Hi Chaimon! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 02:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will take note of this and be more careful in future! Chaimon 03:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)