User talk:Charhenderton

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Charhenderton, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Charhenderton, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Joel Fuhrman seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{Help me}} on your talk page here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Daffydavid (talk) 10:16, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Joseph Mercola[edit]

Your recent editing history at Joseph Mercola shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Note especially the link to BRD above. When your very first BOLD edit is Reverted, the next step is for you to start a Discussion on the article's talk page. You are not supposed to restore your edit, as such an action is the start of an edit war. You've been here long enough to know that. So you have a choice to either forget the matter (since a clear consensus opposes your edit), or you can discuss the matter and figure out how to proceed. We work collaboratively here. If your arguments are based in policy and your sources are reliable, you might have a chance of convincing others to work out a compromise solution. -- Brangifer (talk) 04:00, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]