User talk:Charles01/Archive 46

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pamela Lane[edit]

Thanks for adding PL's obit to the John Osborne page. Absolutely appropriate. Stu (talk) 14:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing and (since it's positive) for taking time out to share your reaction. I still don't understand why she's seemingly the only one of John Osborne's many wives without her own wiki-entry. She's been featuring on talk radio here in England this week, and yesterday while I was putting summer wheels on the car I actually stopped to listen. (I have the radio on in the background permanently, but stopping to listen is something else.) Anyhow, now we've been hearing her name on the radio over here, maybe someone will be moved to make a start. The Guardian obit might be a reasonable jumping off point. But .... no pressure! Success Charles01 (talk) 14:26, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iris Radisch, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ARD and Camus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Well-rounded[edit]

Cool new picture on your user page. I find it hard to believe there was an artist called Ms Plump but - if you say so. ;-))

Best regards, Eddaido (talk) 23:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Splendid name indeed.


The Espace must still have been very rare then. It must have been September 1984 when I joined my parents by train for the end of their annual "two week foreign holiday". Last holiday "en famille" before my father died. My work then involved generous allocation to the company of international rail tickets which colleagues tended to shun because they preferred to travel by air to beach resorts. (We were younger then ...) But it says in Wikipedia-en they only sold 9 Espaces in July 1984, and the auto-industry then generally shut up shop each August to retool for the new model year. But the Espace was assembled at that time by Matra who were presumably more "artisanal" in their approach than you would get in a 'standard' Renault plant driven by the requirements of a high-volume assembly line. Whether or not the actual sales volume quoted in wiki-en is correct, I do think they "ramped up" production of the Espace quite slowly. The Plymouth Voyager had been around across the Atlantic since 1983, but here in Europe the "people carrier" concept was very novel, and Matra weren't used to Renault levels of "volume production". And yes, I am for that and other reasons moderately proud of that picture. >33 years ago .... tiens!


Good to hear from you Charles01 (talk) 07:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerhard Storz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friedrich Maurer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


It's a stub,, till 1934.Xx236 (talk) 09:19, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More input needed and more will come! Feel free to contribute. Charles01 (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doria Ragland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the feedback![edit]

Appreciate your fast review and feedback on my edit. Since I'm quite new to Wiki it's good to see that there are actually people watching and responding. If there's anything I can improve - happy to learn from you!


All the best from Germany,

Jörg Ruhri Jörg (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Um ... good. Enjoy contributing to wikipedia and thank you for doing it. And yes ... you never know when someone will notice. On English wikipedia you can go to the "Revision history of "Christine Bergmann"" (click on the "View History" tab) and then click on "Page view statistics" to see how many people open a page each day. Sometimes this is encouraging: sometimes not. But maybe you noticed that already. On what to improve, you just need to read entries that interest you and notice - often subconsciously - what works and what doesn't. Beyond that, if you inadvertently breach any Richtlinien (1) someone will probably tell you and (2) most guidelines are open to interpretation and many contradict each other, so really your most reliable critic is likely to be you. Success. Charles01 (talk) 15:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for May 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georg Kropp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heidenheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Climax CR1[edit]

Hello Charles, I been meaning of creating a article of a recent obscure car manufacturer called Climax. It was designed and produced by Coventry Graduates and inspired by the racing Cooper Climax in the 1950s. There was a showroom in Warwick which I photographed and uploaded onto the Commons.


It was first a concept car back in 2007 but I think they made a production version of it. They even have it own shownroom which I photographed (below) at the time. (The building itself was demolished). Not much information have surfaced after 2015. I presumed they went bankrupted and shrouded in obscurity.


My problem is that I never done a Wikipedia article before like how to lay out stuff and cite links which I already got as well as owning a physical brochure of it. May I ask if you could help with it or at least give some tips of creating the article that fit to Wikipedia standards.


I have made up a word document with a list of links that mention about the vehicle including archived links although I done it on Google Docs. --Vauxford (talk) 18:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I'll look forward to reading what you come up with. I remember Cooper-Climax as a name from when I was a kid, but I don't really remember anything beyond the name.
Never having done a wikipedia article before does not need to be a problem. It is, after all, something that every wikipedia contributor has been through, and most seem to emerge the other side none the worse for the experience. Just make sure you have a couple of verifiable sources. The wiki-word-processing thing is designed so that even computer barely-literates such as myself can use it. Don't let the jargonistas scare you off. (I still don't know what they mean by "template", though it's a usual enough word in the world outside. And they do love their obscure wiki-acronyms.) Just as with every new word processing programme or spreadsheet programme that you get thrown at you, each one has its own quirks that you get used to by using the programme. Or has Bill Gates so monopolised the world of application software that these days no one ever has to get beyond Microsoft Word and Excel? That's why they're so expensive. I vote for Open Office! Regards Charles01 (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


@Charles01: How do I source information from a brochure? I own a brochure of the vehicle I got from the showroom before it ended up abandoned and demolished and has some technical information that I couldn't find on the internet. --Vauxford (talk) 19:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


It depends what information you have on the brochure.
Also there are different ways of doing source notes. Mine isn't automatically always the best, but generally it works for me.
One of the source notes on this article references a brochure. You might copy and then adapt the format. But where you use a brochure as a source it's a good idea to try and find other sources which are a little less ,,, um ... commercially motivated as well. But yes, simply for dimensions and other non contentious factual stuff on specification a brochure can be a useful source. Regards Charles01 (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you. That will come in handy. --Vauxford (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


1968 VW 411 picture[edit]

Hello Charles01, may I please use your 1968 VW 411 picture (white 4 door car) in a VW history book I am writing? Thanks. Marc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qbert82 (talkcontribs) 18:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You should make sure you have read and understood whatever it says under "Licensing" on the page in question, but to the best of my knowledge and belief there are no issues. I'm afraid it was produced with a rather basic camera and the picture does not benefit from being enlarged, but I guess the quality is ok if you keep the picture relatively small. Those early 411s - before they switched to twin headlamps - were never big sellers even in West Germany. I think the next year when they fitted twin headlights AND fuel injection they sold a bit better. But sadly the poor old 411/412 never really captured the spirit of the times. Me? The first time I could afford a new car it was a Passat. I wish you every success with your project. Charles01 (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The notice at the top of your userpage![edit]

Quick suggestion! What if you put something like this:


It might be easier to read! Cheers, JustBerry (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Three messages on my talk page in the space of an hour. Are the gods conspiring to keep me from checking my emails or watching television? But thank you for the suggestion. Let me see ..... Yes, that seemed to work. Thanks again. And since you're in a helpful mood, what do wikipedia contributors mean when they use the word "template"? I catch myself using the things without really having much clue about what they are or why they work. (when they do...) Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, Wikipedia tends to get like that some times. Take a break! It helps.
No problem for the suggestion. I just thought it might make it easier to read and make your talk page a little more colorful.
This is a quick overview of templates if you're curious. Templates have a variety of functionalities. For example, they can be used as a way to represent blocks of text that can be edited from one central location. Let us say I create User:Charles01/Have a good day and put {{User:Charles01/Have a good day}} on multiple pages. Now, I want to add a smiley face at the end of my message. The good thing is that I only have to add the smiley face to User:Charles01/Have a good day and not all of the other pages that I added {{User:Charles01/Have a good day}} to. Does this kind of make sense? In the case above where I customized the caution template for you, that template allows me to have all of the cautionary box jazz, i.e. the box, background color, exclamation symbol photo, etc., without writing it all out myself everytime. I "pass" in my message as a parameter to the template, and it puts all of the other formatting around my text (that's a way to think about it). Hopefully, that makes some sense! Cheers, JustBerry (talk) 20:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This points me in some helpful directions. Thank you. Though I think I still have more ... thinking to do. Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 07:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Surely! It's all a process. Reach out if you're stuck or need anything. --JustBerry (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Inappropriate procedure[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you created the article Céleste Albaret, and on looking at your contribs, I see that you have created quite a few articles recently. While that's very commendable, I see that you have begun in each case by changing existing links. Your edit summaries state red link which I plan to blue shortly. You should not be changing links to point to your new articles until they have been created, because your articles may fail notoriety and be deleted, making your link changes inappropriate. Kindly wait a few days after creating articles to make sure that they don't get speedy deleted. Akld guy (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for June 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilse Härter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sachsenhausen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for June 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anne Gravoin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


hey Charles...[edit]

...i would like to get a "friendly advice" too:


how to handle the it_wiki-version ??

(in the beginning it seemed to be a suitable translation, but it changed step by step into the nowadays "it:Hildegard Burkhardt")


i would start with a move (at least to "Felizitas Beetz") as the relevant name - even for Italy. Hildegard Burkhardt was not at all of encyclopedic interest! her role in history started as "Hildegard Beetz"; she was already married when the Ciano-papers came to the state of international interest... its like the americans would insist on the lemma "Hilde Blum", just because of their special interests...


please answer by personal wiki-email, or on de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Najadenn if possible!


thanx and lg, ulli p.--NBarchiv (talk) 18:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


(answered elsewhere Charles01 (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Franz von Roggenbach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Staufen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for July 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Waldtraut Lewin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DDR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).


(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]