User talk:CharlesShirley/Archives/2020/October

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maria Bartiromo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not remove adjectives that help with readability and do not invalidate the facts. Also, in regards to Fox's interview: there was no mention of her questioning claims by him + the article also states that "...she fails to question Trump...". Snowycats (talk) 23:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Responded to this nonsense in the revert of above editor: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Maria_Bartiromo&type=revision&diff=985819305&oldid=985790890 -- CharlesShirley (talk) 22:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

For the record: (Undid revision 985790890 by Snowycats (talk) My edits were not "disruptive" I gave reasonable explanations for each of them. Just because you don't like them does not make them "disruptive". The information was not neutral POV and I calmed it down. The basic info is still there, just not presented in non-NPOV.) -- CharlesShirley (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)