User talk:Chaulin humberto tuteto

March 2014[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Never Do It Bad Things Again and Again.... Chaulin humberto tuteto (talk) 01:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm revoking your talk page access. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Never Do It Bad Things Again.... Chaulin humberto tuteto (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm John. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!--John (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --John (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --John (talk) 07:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MASEM (t) 18:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Edit warring, as you did at My Little Pony: Equestria Girls. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MASEM (t) 20:51, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Im Sorry. Chaulin humberto tuteto (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Let's see, you've edited from 10 different IPs, 9 of which are blocked as open proxies, from three different ranges on two continents; are you sure you're not seeking out open proxies? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Solarra. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Madagascar 4 with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 20:52, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Penguins of Madagascar (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{Official website|http://www.dreamworks.com/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Penguins of Madagascar a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:44, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello! I do appreciate your additions in your edits of recent news flying around Sleeping Dogs: Triad Wars however the "news" going around has been purely speculative. Once we get official confirmation on release and dates we can add in the information, such as your edits here for platform and here for dates. Please await a more official news source and then add them back in as I'm sure both cases will likely be correct. WhereAmI (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series)[edit]

Hello Chaulin humberto tuteto,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LS1979 (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MLP.EG.LOGO.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MLP.EG.LOGO.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series)[edit]

The article My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Two films do not make for the series, and if we really need it, My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic is where it should be discussed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MASEM (t) 03:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (film series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MASEM (t) 04:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not restore this article from the redirect. It was determined by consensus at the discussion linked above that the article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. ansh666 03:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Equestria Academy[edit]

Please stop adding information about the rumored Series Equestria Academy without additional sourced that proof its existence. This is most like just the French name of Rainbow Rocks and the shorts, otherwise more info about this would have been released by now. Gial Ackbar (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLP.EG.LOGO.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLP.EG.LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ymblanter (talk) 08:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:MLP.EG.LOGO.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MLP.EG.LOGO.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Dora the Explorer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] Unsourced series end date, and future events must be sourced anyway, per WP:CRYSTAL Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Windows Server 2003 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Avono (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Rainbow Rocks. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gial Ackbar (talk) 12:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at My Little Pony: Equestria Girls - Rainbow Rocks, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. KJ^Discuss? 00:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Barney's-Great-Adventure-Poster.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Barney's-Great-Adventure-Poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Angry Birds High Res.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Angry Birds High Res.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im Sorry....... Chaulin humberto tuteto (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Being sorry is not enough. Please show that you have understood what you were blocked for, and indicate how you'll prevent such problems from recurring. Huon (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Rainbow Rocks. SummerPhD (talk) 05:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Diaper , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls 3[edit]

The article My Little Pony: Equestria Girls 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A Facebook announcement of "having acquired the rights" is not enough to write an encyclopedia article about this possible film. Practically all the information give, say director, country, "developed by", ... is unreferenced, and given that they haven't started filming, it's far too soon to write about it on Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 18:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD template[edit]

Hi, here and here you remove PROD templates without sufficient reason. You have provided no sufficient sources that My Little Pony: Equestria Girls 3 is a legitimate upcoming project. Do not remove the PROD template without first providing sufficient sources, as this will be considered disruptive. Since you have recently come off of a behavioral block, it is not a smart move to force the existence of an article that so far appears to have been created in your imagination. The fact that you have propagated so many Infobox fields without any confirmation whatsoever that anybody has even thought of this series, suggests that you are trying to perpetuate a hoax. Please stop. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls 3[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as My Little Pony: Equestria Girls 3, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games[edit]

The article My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFF as there is no evidence this film has entered principal photography and there is very little coverage of it in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk 03:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games

added links pointing to Applejack, Spike, Rarity and Ashleigh Ball

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Everymorning talk 21:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of América celebra a Chespirito[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on América celebra a Chespirito requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Sam ^Sing! 00:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monster High (film)[edit]

The article Monster High (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NFF, hasn't entered principal photography. Only reference is passing mention of franchise and IMDb.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with My Little Pony: Equestria Girls – Friendship Games. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monster High (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monster High (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster High (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Monster High (film), you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Toy Story 2. Diffs: [2][3] You have been asked numerous times since 2014 to stop submitting unsourced content, which you have also done in the above edits. Even if sourced, it can be safely assumed that Toy Story 2 has occasionally been broadcast all across the world. It is not particuarly noteworthy that it was broadcast on Telemundo. If you disagree, find a source that explains why it is significant. We are not here to catalog every appearance of the film on every network across the globe. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 Months for persistent disruptive editing. Disruptive editing include persistent removal of deletion templates; creation of inappropriate pages and text against consensus; and a continual failure to discuss any issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. However, any continuation of problematic editing will result in an indefinite block from editing Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked now, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Never Put Bad Things Again...................:( Chaulin humberto tuteto (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've only said that a million times before... — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long-term disruptive editing, continuing despite a number of blocks. There has to come a time when we decide "this editor has been given enough chances, and obviously has no intention of stopping disruptive editing, so it is time to block indefinitely." That time came when you made this edit: in view of your past history, that was totally unacceptable. At the time of your last block, you were told "any continuation of problematic editing will result in an indefinite block from editing Wikipedia", so this indefinite block cannot come as a surprise. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Will Never Do Bad Things Again, Again And Again On Wikipedia, I Will Never Do Abuse Editing Again, Unblock Me,Chaulin humberto tuteto (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been given chances Again and Again to Never Do Bad Things. Seems to be a terminal case of WP:COMPETENCE. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chaulin humberto tuteto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am genuinely sorry for getting involved in an obvious editing war, and although I'm not connected in any way with the two suspect biased accounts in question - I do have the belief that the various articles surrounding these subjects are being heavily manipulated and prejuidiced by these individuals (and this fact is ignored by administrators because the editors are so emotionally connected). However, I humbly request that you re-instate my account, where I will only do good from here on in and leave said articles alone. I promise to do good from here on in, and apologize for coming off as a meatpuppet!

Decline reason:

Seriously, at least copy an old unblock request that isn't currently in the queue. I've removed your ability to edit this page. Kuru (talk) 23:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: Cute, but this reply appears to be entirely plagiarized. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mojanglogoold.svg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mojanglogoold.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Thomasmovieteaster.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Thomasmovieteaster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 21:46, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]