User talk:Cherries Jubilee
Welcome!
Hello, Cherries Jubilee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson 01:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
A Minor Barnstar for you[edit]
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Even if you had technological help, editing every Avatar page in the total span of a few hours just to update the character links is quite impressive. Congratulations! Herald Alberich 04:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC) |
Here I was going to give you the award but someone else already did it. Thank you so much for all your help! H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 06:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Wow.. thanks! I haven't quite done them all yet. I just have the individual episode pages left but I'm about to do them now. Cherries Jubilee 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The O.C. Aging[edit]
Hey there Cherries. I appreciate you discussing this with me and I agree that the whole aging process is confusing, however as long as the date of birth is mentioned, I see no reason to include the ages BEFORE the flashforward sequence. While the show was still running, Wikipedia users would update the ages of O.C. characters from season to season, however since the show has come to an end, I think we should simply include the age the characters were in their final appearance. I don't mind how we do this, as long as we don't have 3-4 ages for each character, which is overkill IMO. Cheers. Sillygostly 09:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Cherries Jubilee! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]
| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Cherries Jubilee! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion[edit]
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Cherries Jubilee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
About Battlefield V[edit]
Hi Cherries. I think "perceived" should be removed because simply - beyond the debate - DICE itself claimed to have undertaken a more imaginative vision of WWII in the game. I mean: after all, the developers themselves consider it to be so. And actually a bit of historical inaccuracy seems to be there. So I would not use "perceived". Lone Internaut (talk) 06:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Lone Internaut: Okay, I see what you mean. However, I still think a qualifier would be good. It's not like the previous games were 100% accurate and lack of historicity complaints varied from ones that were completely fair and accurate to ones that were historically inaccurate themselves. So something like "... causing backlash from fans of the series for the increased lack of historical accuracy in the series..." or "... causing backlash from fans of the series for the degree of historical inaccuracy..." Cherries Jubilee (talk) 06:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I think the second one would work fine. Lone Internaut (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'll edit it in then. Cherries Jubilee (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |