User talk:ChockerStalker

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of DinoBambinoNFS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChockerStalker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock. I only created it after getting reverted. I have edited before for a long time. See the IP address 111.93.186.174 you blocked. There seems to be a problem.

Decline reason:

As I told you yesterday on the IRC unblock channel under a different name, you will need to wait 6 months before an unblock is considered. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChockerStalker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked under the reason of being a suspected sockpuppet. Why? Because I recently found a mass-removal of content of a blocked editor and reverted it. I have even told they can check and my IP is static nowadays. But I'm still not being unblocked. Can anyone lift the block? Why have I been banned as suspected that too over an article?

Decline reason:

Confirmed to MonsterHunter32.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 01:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I wonder if reverting mass-removal is similar to being a sock. ChockerStalker (talk) 20:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What? I had read the article Slavery in India a few days ago and reverted mass-removal when I found it out today. If you want you can compare me, I'm not MonsterHunter32. This is amazing, I've got a static IP and I'm banned for being a suspected sockpuppet just because I didn't like a mass-removal. ChockerStalker (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gad, I hate sub rosa communications.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You seem very familiar with the article Slavery in India and the events related to that article. Can you prove that you have edited this article before with your IP or any other account? Because you couldn't be that familiar without having prior contributions there. Capitals00 (talk) 18:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He said elsewhere (if memory serves) (RFPP?) that he'd created the account after editing as an anon at that article in order to have, i believe, better credibility(?).-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When I joined I said I created the account to keep track of my edits. As for proof Capitals00, I haven't edited it. I have read part of that article before out of interest, and when I came to read again it was massively changed. How will I miss it? ChockerStalker (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]