User talk:Chocofrito

Chocofrito, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chocofrito! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Crimea, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

@Iryna Harpy: It wasn't supposed to more constructive or not in political terms, it was supposed to be more logical concerning to Crimea itself. I'm well aware of the disputes between Ukraine and Russia about the territory, but if the main language there was Crimean Tatar I'd put it in the 1st place, not 2nd, even if it annoys Turkey, e.g. By the way. what's the main language in Tatarstan, for example? If it's Tatar, put Tatar 1st, not Russian. I'll check it about Tatarstan, Bashkortostan and North Caucasian republics.

@Iryna Harpy: In Tatarstan, Russian is 1st... I disagree with that, but if the folks here like to put the country's official language before, taking the de jure status of Crimea, then let it stay like it is.

Hi, Chocofrito. Could you please take your arguments to the article's talk page as there is a current discussion on the sequence of languages (here). I understand that you're not an experienced editor, so please note that it's always best to check to see whether there is a discussion in progress, plus check the archived talk to ensure that there isn't a WP:CONSENSUS decision/ruling in place already. Also, you need to learn not to just edit war and leave your rationale in edit summaries. Article talk pages are there to be used for WP:BRD. Thanks! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States presidential election, 2016. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 21:12, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at United States presidential election, 2016. General Ization ^Talk 21:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)