User talk:Chocolatecoveredorangestuff2
July 2015[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lanni Marchant has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lanni Marchant was changed by Chocolatecoveredorangestuff2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921414 on 2015-07-26T03:10:27+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lanni Marchant. C(u)w(t)C(c) 03:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
August 2015[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lanni Marchant has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lanni Marchant was changed by Chocolatecoveredorangestuff2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894033 on 2015-08-01T15:27:35+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lanni Marchant with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Lanni Marchant shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 15:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
August 2015[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN talk to me 16:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Note the content you added to the article was not in the source provided. Repeating this kind of edit will result in a much longer block. --NeilN talk to me 16:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Chocolatecoveredorangestuff2. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lanni Marchant, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2015 (UTC)