User talk:Christieag

File source problem with File:E Matthew Buckley.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:E Matthew Buckley.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of E. Matthew Buckley[edit]

The article E. Matthew Buckley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable notability. No substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources. Most sources give passing mention so does not constitute "substantial". Fails WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of E. Matthew Buckley[edit]

I have nominated E. Matthew Buckley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Matthew Buckley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Christopher Connor (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied[edit]

Hello, Christieag. You have new messages at Silver seren's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Make sure to let me know once you have it up. I'll see if i'll be able to help you out with it a bit. ^_^ Silver seren^C 17:44, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of E. Matthew Buckley[edit]

I have nominated E. Matthew Buckley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Matthew Buckley (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Sorry if you aren't an SPA. When I said it a week ago (in the Deletion Review, I just copied and pasted the same text to the current discussion) you're contributions were to only one subject matter after a month of editing.

Stick around, have fun, contribute what you know, and don't let impatient and tired old curmudgeons like me get you down - you'll run into far worse I'm sure. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

Whoops[edit]

I...sorta went ahead and added a bunch of references myself. I got caught up in it. Sorry! D: I have also gone ahead and started a discussion on the talk page in order to make the split. Could you go and weigh in on that discussion? Silver seren^C 21:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're awesome! All great stuff. I'll weigh in on the Discussion.

There, it's split off. You might want to go in and reword the summary section that's left in the School of Economic Science article so that it's not an exact copy of the beginning two paragraphs of the School of Practical Philosophy article itself. It doesn't have to be different information, it would just be nicer if it was worded differently, for our readers and all. If that's all you need from me, i'll leave you to work on both of them as you feel like. I'm kinda tied up with Yukon Wolf and other wolf articles myself at the moment. Silver seren^C 19:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Glenn Godfrey (November 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Glenn Godfrey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 17:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Christieag, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! j⚛e decker ^talk 17:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Justin Glenn Godfrey concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Justin Glenn Godfrey, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]