User talk:Chronomical

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Kiemmy garcia. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- pb30<c.t> 02:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strike two, dear Chronomical. Christopher michael romero is also a good example of an atatck page that we do not accept. Please, behave - there are so many ways in which you could help by contructing an encyclopedia, and this kind of editing will only lead you to be blocked for good. Cheers, Phaedriel - 02:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Christopher michael romero, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rockpocket 02:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Amber (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Amber, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk 02:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]