User talk:Circuitcheckr

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your edits were reverted by Jayjg, jpgordon and myself because the Institute for Historical Review is not a reliable source. Please see reliable sources for further reading. Thanks. WilliamH (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop continually reverting other edits. Please discuss changes on the article talk page before inserting information like that; if you continue to do revert the edits I will be forced to apply for a temporary block against you. Ironho lds 16:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, i've seen it; i'm going to hold out on the discussion and see how it progresses, since there are a lot of more knowledgeable/experienced editors than moi. Thanks for informing me, though. Ironho lds 17:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(only post that message template if I actually have a message, not if you're posting one on MY talkpage). I reverted it because I understand the reasoning for reversion, but I also accept that there are others who, in terms of the discussion, can communicate far more succinctly than me and with greater knowledge. It's the difference between knowing how to drive and understanding how an engine works. Ironho lds 01:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Holocaust denial. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. WilliamH (talk) 16:35, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a new user[edit]

It is unusual for a new user to wade into a sensitive article line Holocause Denial and make repeated major edits. If you actually are a new user with hororable motivations, you should spend some time reading articles and discovering how the editing and sourcing process works.Elan26 (talk) 20:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26[reply]