User talk:Citynewsmedia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your username[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Roshan D. Bhondekar, and I noticed that your username, "Citynewsmedia", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Jack Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Roshan D. Bhondekar has been reverted.
Your edit here to Roshan D. Bhondekar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://alivingseriestalk.wordpress.com/2016/04/02/a-living-series-talk-author-roshan-d-bhondekar/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roshan D. Bhondekar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VVikingTalkEdits 13:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

First you should not be editing Roshan D. Bhondekar because you clearly have a Conflict of Interest. Second your User Name and edit history indicate that your account may be more than one person with access to it. In addition to possibly having Multiple Accounts. You can still make suggestions on the talk page, however further editing to the main page of Roshan D. Bhondekar could be considered Disruptive editing. VVikingTalkEdits 13:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Socking[edit]

Information icon Hello, Citynewsmedia, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. VVikingTalkEdits 14:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Citynewsmedia (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As our company is using same network, so IP might be the same, we as book publishing company. An author, Roshan D. Bhondekar is recognized at international level. We do encourage the real talent via our city news media network. We are requesting you to unblock this ID and help us to grow better with Wikipedia network

Decline reason:

There are multiple issues here. The username is promotional, so are the edits, even this unblock request. Your use of "we" implies shared use of the account, which is not permitted. You have barely addressed the meatpuppetry going on (assuming those accounts are not all operated by just one person). I do not see that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.