User talk:Clarkeola
Welcome!
Hello, Clarkeola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 04:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Food for the Brain Foundation has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Deleting Criticism from Holford[edit]
Is there a reason why you deleted the critical material from the Patrick Holford page without explanation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homonovus (talk • contribs)
- Apparently [1]. --Robdurbar 10:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Better link to the above info: http://www.badscience.net/?p=345 --Groyolo 16:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Indefinite Ban[edit]
I've banned this account indefinitely under our "Meatpuppets" policy. "These newly created accounts, or anonymous edits, may be friends of another editor, may be related in some way to the subject of an article under discussion, or may have been solicited by someone to support a specific angle in a debate". The policy states that these can be dealt with in the same way as "sockpuppet" accounts i.e. indefinite bans. --Robdurbar 10:57, 6 January 2007 (UTC)