User talk:CloeyDeb

January 2024[edit]

Hi CloeyDeb! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 07:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. D CloeyDeb (talk) 02:11, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susanne (Susi) Tegen (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like a resume instead of a biography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susanne (Susi) Tegen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CloeyDeb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zivit Inbar (March 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zivit Inbar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zivit Inbar[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bandit Heeler (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. @Bandit Heeler

Thanks for your support and feedback.

I'm wondering if you could just identify 1 thing you could recommend so I can understand how to move forward to correct the issue.

Much appreciated.

@CloeyDeb CloeyDeb (talk) 03:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zivit Inbar[edit]

Hello, CloeyDeb,

Thank you for creating Zivit Inbar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi there, thanks for creating the article. Kindly fix the WP:REFBOMB.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gidonb - thanks for the notification. I'm currently looking at editing the article as per recommendations. Any advise that you can provide will be valuable. CloeyDeb (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there @Vanderwaalforces. Please note I have made changes to this article, and addressed the WP: REFBOMB issue I hope. I look forward to any further feedback. D CloeyDeb (talk) 01:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zivit Inbar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zivit Inbar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zivit Inbar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gidonb (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to made changes to this tomorrow. I'll let you know when they are done. 49.180.6.106 (talk) 08:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made significant edits to this article including the copy and hopefully I've addressed the WP:REFBOMB issue that was cited as a problem. I look forward to any further feedback and assistance you can offer. D CloeyDeb (talk) 01:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hacia Atherton (April 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Also please remove external links within the body of the article. See WP:GNG for the quality of sources that are required to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hacia Atherton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]