User talk:Coding magician

Welcome!

Hello, Coding magician, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cunard (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Box office number-one films of 2005 (Canada)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Box office number-one films of 2005 (Canada), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Box office number-one films of 2005 (USA). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Box office number-one films of 2010 (Canada)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Box office number-one films of 2010 (Canada), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of 2009 box office number-one films in Canada. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:27, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of 2004 box office number-one films in Canada[edit]

The article List of 2004 box office number-one films in Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unrefernced. Fails WP:VER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of 2005 box office number-one films in Canada[edit]

The article List of 2005 box office number-one films in Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Fails WP:VER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 00:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of 2010 box office number-one films in Canada[edit]

A tag has been placed on List of 2010 box office number-one films in Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 00:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of 2006 box office number-one films in Canada[edit]

The article List of 2006 box office number-one films in Canada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Fails WP:VER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Featured lists[edit]

Please do not add lists to the FL page. If you wish to nominate a list to be considered for featured status, please see WP:FLC. Regards. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Art Directors Guild Award for Excellence in Production Design for a Fantasy Film[edit]

The article Art Directors Guild Award for Excellence in Production Design for a Fantasy Film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No subject is notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. This article is sourced entirely to the Art Directors Guild. No independent sources provided or found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD^v2.0 13:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Visual Effects Society Award for Outstanding Visual Effects in an Effects Driven Feature Motion Picture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Visual Effects Society Award for Outstanding Visual Effects in an Effects Driven Feature Motion Picture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visual Effects Society Award for Outstanding Visual Effects in an Effects Driven Feature Motion Picture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wikitigresito (talk) 14:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]