User talk:Coeusin

List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil

Hello, Coeusin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of ambassadors of Paraguay to Brazil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 01:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Coeusin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 01:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Sourced content

Please do not remove sourced content without good reasoning - as done here FOX 52 ^talk! 16:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

There is no reason to leave that phrase you kept on the page. If you wish to put something there remake the tables you removed (without reasoning). Coeusin (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited StarFist series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lazarus Rising. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Blood Contact

Hi there, I see you removed the redirect on this article, and another editor has put it back. Rather than trying to expand out any of the individual books, I suggest working on StarFist series first. If you end up with a big chunk on one of the books that doesn't have its own article, you can always spin the individual book back out later. This way you won't have any of your work redirected for lacking notability, so it will stay up on Wikipedia instead of being hidden behind a redirect. -- asilvering (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I do not understand your language; why would you say another user when you did it yourself? Frankly, this should have been discussed in the articles' talk pages, rather than done outright; this is an unconsulted deletion of articles, violating WP:DP blatantly.

I shall thus revert your changes made to the individual books' articles, so that in their talk pages arguments can be presented for/against their permanence.

Cheers. Coeusin (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I said another user did it because they did; here is the diff: [1]. The action was a WP:BLAR, not a deletion, and does not violate any deletion policy. Arguments presented for or against an article's redirection or deletion don't tend to be made on the individual talk pages, but at WP:AFD. -- asilvering (talk) 00:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

He did it for one book - you did it for five or six others. Thanks for explaining the policy for me though. Coeusin (talk) 12:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I did not [do] it for five or six others. The "it" here is putting a redirect back on an article after you'd removed it. You'd only removed the one, so there is no way I could have done it for five or six others. What happened is that I saw your rationale, which was that all the other books had articles, reasoned that they were all likely just as non-notable and undersourced, found that they were, and did a WP:BLAR on them also. Again, I really suggest developing the article on the series, and expanding back outwards only if sufficient material is found. -- asilvering (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

This is, with all due respect, a sophistry. What the other user did was turn an article which was once a redirect into a redirect again; you made articles which were never redirects into redirects. The end result is the same.

The seemingly likely conclusion to the AFD discussion will be weird. The latter books of the series will be kept as articles because they have easier to find sources. The earlier ones won't. I will have to add the information on the earlier books and the latter books to the main series article, which will clutter it (needlessly imo). Coeusin (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't at all see what is sophistic about saying I see you removed the redirect on this article, and another editor has put it back. and then being confused when you said I was being unclear and I had done this action myself. I wouldn't call the outcome of the AfD yet; for all we know, someone might find sources that merit a keep on one or all of those books. But developing a main article and then spinning out individual subtopics once they become unwieldy is perfectly normal - see WP:SPINOUT for some basic guidelines. You're absolutely welcome to do that. -- asilvering (talk) 17:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of First to Fight (novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First to Fight (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First to Fight (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

asilvering (talk) 01:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Starfist Blood Contact cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starfist Blood Contact cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Coeusin. Thank you for your work on Juan Crisóstomo Centurión. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice article, thanks for putting it together!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 22:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Coeusin (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)