User talk:Colombianstar

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Colombianstar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please set a date or period until which I am to be blocked, so that I can at least comply and adhere with it this time, as well as having a cetainty of the time I am going to serve for my honest mistake. If it is still set on the uncertain "indefinite", as has been done previously as well, this will only uncontrollably make me continue making contributions to Wikipedia from my other computer.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, and it is clear that you are the same person as the operator of several other blocked accounts. If you wish to edit, please log in to your first account and request an unblock there. Threats to create new accounts and continue to violate wikipedia's WP:SOCK policy will not get you anywhere. Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Colombianstar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have already requested to be unblocked from my first account three times and despite a final repeated plea and request for being a contructive editor, I still had to face what I call "wiki-bullying." My first account (User:Strider11) has now been stripped of all privilges, as well as not being able to edit its talk page, and it's block has been set to the very irritating indefinite. All I want is to get back on Wikipedia, and it is my promise that I will never do anything that forces me against the rules of Wikipedia, only if you unblock me for once, after a standard blocking period.

Decline reason:

No. We don't like threats. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 04:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Colombianstar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What do you mean "we don't like threats"? Since when did I make a "threat"? I am expecting a very simple thing-just give a straight response and please take the initiative to inform me or at least give me an idea how long I am going to serve for my block, because I cannot sit silently for the next decade or so until administrators happily keep everything "indefinite."

Decline reason:

Whether your primary account is to be unblocked I make no comment on; but use of this account as a sock while your other account is blocked is block evasion, and as such it is correctly indefinitely blocked. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 10:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to wish to edit Wikipedia again. Let me make some suggestions which may help you to this end.

Stop violating Wikipedia policy. See The Standard Offer. The proper way to have a block removed is prove you intend to stop the violations that led to the block. The current violation you are under is WP:SOCK, so in order to have this block removed, you need to STOP creating new accounts. MY version of the standard offer goes something like this:
1. Make a full alocution. That means you need to list every account you have ever created, so that we know you aren't hiding anything.
2. Stop creating new accounts, and abide by this block for a few months. I'll not set a date, but give it 2 or more months to prove that you intend to abide by the sanctions placed against you.
3. When a few months have passed, make a new unblock request, and let us know that you have been obeying the rules, and wish to create no more problems. At that point, we can begin a discussion at WP:ANI to decide if you should be allowed to edit again.
I have made several of these offers to people, and nearly every time that a person has followed this procedure, they have been ultimately unblocked. The whole idea is that you have to earn the community's trust back again before you will be unblocked. So there you go; you wanted a timeline, there's one. Give it 2-3 months, request a new unblock at that date, and we will proceed from there. If, however, you continue to violate the WP:SOCK policy during that time, expect no quarter... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 16:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Colombianstar! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Greetings...[edit]

Hello, Colombianstar, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Happy editing! RadioFan (talk) 02:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meher Mohammad Khalil[edit]

While a hero, he isn't notable. Take a look at WP:BIO1E. It would be far better to write a good section in 2009 Lahore attack on Sri Lankan cricket team, more readers will be looking there and will read about him there. The article that you created redirects there now so noone will get lost.--RadioFan (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Main Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 04:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Indian martial arts. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jogendra Nath Mandal. Eugene2x►^talk 05:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistani Trinidadian[edit]

Hi, thanks for creating this article. However, you have not supplied the source which you have drawn on for this information. Wikipedia's content needs to be verifiable from reliable sources. Please can you give a source? See here to see how to do this.--Scott Mac (Doc) 16:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of India and state terrorism[edit]

I have nominated India and state terrorism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India and state terrorism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OliverTwisted ^(Talk)(Stuff) 08:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to sign your posts on all talk pages. There are links above explaining how to do this. Without your signature, we don't know with whom we are discussing a topic. Best regards. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk)(Stuff) 10:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pakistani Trinidadian[edit]

I have nominated Pakistani Trinidadian, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistani Trinidadian. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OliverTwisted ^(Talk)(Stuff) 04:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Sikh architecture in Pakistan[edit]

Category:Bus drivers by nationality[edit]

Category:Bus drivers by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:44, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rao family has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Rao family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]