User talk:ComputerFreak34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Subway

No problem, thanks for the edit. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,533 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Kmart (talk) Add sources
37 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mooyah (talk) Add sources
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Daylight Donuts (talk) Add sources
273 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B 2020 in the United States (talk) Add sources
1,476 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B COVID-19 pandemic in California (talk) Add sources
1,228 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Trump family (talk) Add sources
807 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Bill Robinson (talk) Cleanup
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C A4 motorway (Netherlands) (talk) Cleanup
2,579 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Ryan Higa (talk) Cleanup
450 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Quiznos (talk) Expand
55 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Speculation about Donald Trump's Cabinet (talk) Expand
7,404 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Andrew Cuomo (talk) Expand
213 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Western Auto (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,604 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Andrea Mitchell (talk) Unencyclopaedic
440 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Citizenship of the European Union (talk) Unencyclopaedic
51 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Facebook Messenger Rooms (talk) Merge
1,949 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Pizza Hut (talk) Merge
587 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign (talk) Merge
45 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C KTIV (talk) Wikify
475 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C The Family (Australian New Age group) (talk) Wikify
2,737 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election (talk) Wikify
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C D.P. Dough (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ravattula Church (talk) Orphan
23 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA Bagrrys India Limited (talk) Orphan
52 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pita Pit (talk) Stub
64 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Red Bull TV (talk) Stub
178 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Semantic Scholar (talk) Stub
182 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bob Quinn (American football) (talk) Stub
77 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ichiran (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Olga Boric-Lubecke (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ComputerFreak34! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 02:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Returning user?

Hello ComputerFreak34, are you a returning user, or have you edited anonymously before, or under another user id? I noticed that by your 20th edit, you had created your twinkleoptions.js subpage and by your 60th, you had imported scripts into your vector.js and common.js. That's pretty unusual for a new editor. There are legitimate uses for alternative accounts; see WP:VALIDALT for details. But it's not okay to use two accounts, or to come back under a different name if there were problems with the old one. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry for details, and follow the recommendations there regarding multiple accounts. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 02:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have made edit anonymously before, but decided I should make an account, so I did on February 21, 2020 (over 1 year ago) and I have never had another another account, but do share my house/internet conncetion with others. I created my twinkleoptions.js subpage because I was planning on using Twinkle, but decided not to and do my edit manually. I imported scripts into your vector.js and common.js as I was trying to customize my userpage with things I seen on other Wikipedian's pages. Are you suggesting I have two acccounts? ComputerFreak34 (talk) 02:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are still fairly new and have an unusual early edit pattern. I was asking if you were a returning user, and you've answered. Thanks for posting your response. I believe that concludes the matter.
By the way, responses to previous comments should be indented, according to talk page conventions. You'll notice that this reply is indented. No need to go back and change your previous message now, but going forward, please follow the reply conventions. You can find a detailed description at WP:THREAD. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not alter other users' comments

(edit conflict × 2) Hi again. Please do not alter other users' comments on Talk pages, not even to fix punctuation or spelling errors. And especially don't change the words of another user when it changes the meaning of what they say. About the worst thing one could do, Even worse, would be to change the words in a bolded vote in the context of an Rfc or a Move request. Unfortunately, in this edit in the Move request at Talk:State v. Chauvin#Requested move 20 April 2021, that's exactly what you did. This caused at least one other editor to become confused, who came within an inch of undoing the Move request template. Luckily, they held off and requested clarification. I've reverted that edit of yours, and added an explanation for the other user, but going forward, please leave others' messages alone. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that it won't happen again, and I misunderstood what the editor to which I edited was trying to say and I didn't mean to cause that editor to become confused and I apologize for any confusion I caused and I'll leave others' messages alone. ComputerFreak34 (talk) 03:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict × 2) No worries; glad you understood. There are even some rules about changing your own words, in an earlier message. Normally, it's okay to do that; but once someone else has responded to you, you have to do it in a special way. As it happens, I was in the middle of improving my own wording above, in the 03:07 post, but you responded first, so I couldn't do that. Instead, I used a combo of underscore and strikeout; see WP:REDACT for how this works.
Aha, I see that you also fixed the indentation just above, which is why I got the second edit conflict; good work. (Another link you might want to follow, in case it happens to you: Help:Edit conflict.) Mathglot (talk) 03:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help and setting me straight on the issue at hand. ComputerFreak34 (talk) 03:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [Special:SecurePoll/vote/801 voting page]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the [Special:SecurePoll/vote/804 voting page]. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia and copyright

Control copyright icon Hello ComputerFreak34! Your additions to T-Mobile US have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What part of what I added was copyright material? ComputerFreak34 (talk) 21:15, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Content copied from CNN consisted of two quotations but you also copied the surrounding prose. That's not okay. You can view the overlap at CopyPatrol: click on the iThenticate link. — Diannaa (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I rewrote the part in question excluding any copyrighted material. ComputerFreak34 (talk) 21:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much better; thanks for taking the time to do that. — Diannaa (talk) 21:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your quite welcome and sorry for my mistake! ComputerFreak34 (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

I noticed that you tagged Fly, Ohio for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion or criteria specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. - Adolphus79 (talk) 00:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]