User talk:Conchuir
Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Additional tips[edit]
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- For Wikipedia policies and guidelines see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
- Find everything in the Directory.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- Introduce yourself at the new user log.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
- If you have edits from before creating an account try this.
- To Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
- Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Be Bold!![edit]
You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round. 
Joe I 02:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Guster[edit]
 | I see that you've made edits in articles about Guster. I'm trying to create a WikiProject to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the band. If you're interested, please express interest for WikiProject Guster on the proposal page. Thanks! - [hmwith] |
University of Rochester article[edit]
Hey, thanks for the message. I did the (partial) revert because I noticed that the section didn't make sense in some places and tried reverting to restore (which didn't work). I just redid the formatting again and restored the missing stuff (eg removing certain headings made the subsequent sentences not make sense). Also, because of the size of the section, I opted for further sectionalization (ones that do not appear in the TOC) for visual style and ease of reading. Now, the section IS way to big so it should probably be trimmed down altogether. If you want to take a swing at it, go for it, otherwise I'll probably try trimming it later. Thanks. Cquan (after the beep...) 16:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)