User talk:Concord19
Concord19, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Concord19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC) |
Discretionary Sanctions Notice - Climate Change[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Michael Hedges[edit]
I saw your reverts in the Hedges article. Are you sure the YouTube video you linked to is not a copyright violation? You need to give it some thought beyond "I like this video". If you have, let me know in detail. You say he was the "Eddie Van Halen of acoustic guitar". Can I assume you are a fan? This is an interesting comment given that Van Halen died yesterday. Is it possible you are not being impartial or neutral? I'm fairly certain Pierre Bensusan used the neck tapping technique before either Hedges or Van Halen. It's neat, but it's a gimmick. I studied classical guitar in college. It's your opinion that he radically changed a genre. Which genre? I liked Aerial Boundaries. When it came out, I was a disc jockey who played it over the air, though it wasn't really a jazz album. The Windham Hill Records created the New Age genre. I agree that Hedges was talented, but it's not up to Wikipedia (or you or me) to tell people what to think. We present facts. Let readers make up their own minds who the best acoustic guitarist is. There's a lot of competition for that title.
Vmavanti (talk) 03:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
United States presidential eligibility legislation[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
WP:BRD indicates the proper procedure after a reversion is to discuss on the talk page. If you disagree with your edits being reverted, please start a discussion about them on the talk page. --Weazie (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- "Users are expected to collaborate with others..."
- Apparently your version of "collaborate with others" is to provide unsound rationale for clobbering an editor's clear effort toward improving Wikipedia, and after you get reverted with the reason for doing so provided, you then go to that users' Talk page to threaten them. --Concord19 (talk) 09:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)