User talk:Congopro

June 2023[edit]

Hello Congopro. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Congopro. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Congopro|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid[edit]

Hello, I just saw your message, but it does not say that I am paid

I choose, if I don't have what I am in the cinematic fields, I write about the actors of the directors and other members of the cinematography. It's not in my interests.

I am not implying that I am being paid by any person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to further their interests. Advocacy pays off

What interests me is not what interests me, it is to write a perfect article that everyone can appreciate.

My request was to know if I wrote everything perfect,

This is not to say that I present the person in question

This is a topic I wanted to address, thank you for your understanding, it's not what you think thank you Congopro (talk) 06:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How did you come to edit about Anzor Alem? Your name is "Congopro" which strongly suggests you are here for something related to your job("pro"= professional). 331dot (talk) 09:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your first edit also had some very difficult formatting(for a brand new user) in it. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congopro do you have other accounts too? Because two other accounts also trying hard to get the Draft:Anzor Alem approved. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am here the one and only Congopro I hope to be up to the task of publishing the article of an actor and musician

Congolese, I have a question so I no longer have the rights to write on the article Anzor Alem, where I no longer have the rights to edit on Wikipedia Congopro (talk) 18:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone may write about any subject that they choose, but the Terms of Use and Wikipedia policies require a connection to the subject to be disclosed. If you have no connection, please tell what made you edit about this individual that you have been trying to edit about for almost a year. 331dot (talk) 19:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me direct, this article is what prompted me to write about this individual because I am passionate about cinematography I wanted to create a perfect article for an actor of my country Congopro (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection with the subject

It's just that I was passionate about writing about him, I know it's contrary to the rules of Wikipedia, I don't know if it impacts, and for me modify them on Wikipedia Congopro (talk) 19:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's what pushed me to write about this individual it's the passion I have for cinematography I've always loved creating articles for Congolese actors

I apologize for having brake, the policies of Wikipedia Congopro (talk) 19:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't against a rule to have passion for writing about a topic.

It is not easy to find a draft unless one already knows it exists. How did you find it? 331dot (talk) 20:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to create the topic page, but I found that there was already a draft, I wanted to improve it and have it published Congopro (talk) 20:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is always a procedure before creating a page. First you have to ask if it already existed on Wikipedia, I had found that the drafts already existed on Wikipedia, now I wanted to improve it and have them published Congopro (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You said "I've always loved creating articles for Congolese actors" but you haven't created any other articles here. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, correct because there are not too many Congolese actors who exist on Wikipedia, I intended to finish with these subjects to take another subject, Moyindo Mpongo

Congolese actor Congopro (talk) 20:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps there is a language barrier here, but when you said "I've always loved creating articles", this suggests you have done so before. What other articles have you created? Your edit history indicates you have not created other articles. 331dot (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In any event, what are the best three(and only three, please) sources you have about this actor that shows how he meet WP:NACTOR and gives him significant coverage? 331dot (talk) 20:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources I have on this actor who show how he meets , https://regionweek.com/anzor-alem-5-things-to-know-about-congolese-born-actor-and-musician/ ,

https://actu.fr/nouvelle-aquitaine/langon_33227/gironde-langon-dadju-en-showcase-au-cinema-grand-ecran-pour-le-film-ima_50503823.html

,

https://www.thewrap.com/how-to-watch-beast-idris-elba-movie-online-streaming-theaters-where/ Congopro (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anzor Alem (June 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not use interviews as source. Use reliable sources about the person.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anzor Alem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Congopro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Congopro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello , Sometimes I use the same IP address as a blocked user and a blocking message describing that other user's activity pops up here at my house my attempts which show a flagrant lack of understanding worsen my situation, I will not repeat it any more; can anything be done to resolve this? you can help me please. .

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. You've been given multiple chances to be open and honest with us and have refused these chances. You've worked hard to demonstrate you cannot be trusted. I see no path forward for you at this time. WP:SO may apply but you'll have to take a totally different approach in order for that to work. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed to Jojoaspel.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I come to you to apologize because I have just had my account blocked, I will no longer do, concerning my conduct, the reason given for my blocking

That I won't do it again

I'm stuck due to problematic draft:Anzor_Alem concerns. But attempts that show a blatant lack of understanding make the situation worse I won't repeat it again; can anything be done to resolve this? Congopro (talk) 21:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The other user was not blocked until you were. There is no point to any of this unless you are fully honest with us. 331dot (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to be totally honest with you. Congopro (talk) 22:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I want doesn't matter, it is up to the checkusers now, as only they can authorize the removal of this block. I am simply saying that your best way forward is complete honesty. 331dot (talk) 22:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm making the mistake of creating two accounts on Wikipedia which and against Wikipedia's policy rules I apologize for doing this, is it about the topics I'm not paid to write on him

I just wanted to interest him in directing a draft article Congopro (talk) 22:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you in communication with Anzor Alem about this draft? 331dot (talk) 22:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not in communication with Anzor Alem

If this abandons to write on him to recover my my account I do them but I am not in communication with him,

I'll just do my best to be more professional than that, I understand the risks

It is not known will not repeat again Congopro (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Je compte écrire sur Moyindo Mpongo ce aussi un acteur congolais, mais je voulais d'abord faire publié les brouillons du sujet Congopro (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]