User talk:Conlawgeek

March 2009[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Second Amendment to the United States Constitution worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 00:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fyi, sockpuppet investigation[edit]

please note that anon ip editor 141.154.15.141 has filed a sockpuppet claim re philo-centinel, saltyboatr, and yourself. [[1]] i don't believe the claim has any merit, but you may defend yourself there. Anastrophe (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the record[edit]

My internet provider just changed my IP from 141.154.12.116 to 141.154.15.141141.154.15.141 (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 15:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. This is not a comment on whether the material you added was accurate. SMP0328. (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The material SMP0328 mentioned as 'original' is actually not original nor controversial and was easily verified in reliable sourcing. SaltyBoatr (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never claimed it was "controversial" and, until it was properly sourced, it was original research under Wiki-policy. I'm glad proper sourcing was found for that material. SMP0328. (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it wasn't original research per policy. It was sourced material and this new editor was asking for help in formatting the citation. Perhaps you missed this explanation on the article talk page: "Sorry have not had time to learn wiki style for notes.". SaltyBoatr (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For your throrough researching, comprehensive contemplation, and your eloquent delivery of kernels of truth into the sometimes contentious and hostile editing environment at the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution article, you have earned this award. SaltyBoatr (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Anastrophe (talk) 15:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]