User talk:ConstantinVacheron

The article about : Waterlogging (archeology), there is incorrectly spelling of the word : archeology. The correct spelling is : Archaeology, also the (A) must be a capital letter (Archaeology).

Speedy deletion nomination of History And Archaeology Through Laboratory Examinations[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on History And Archaeology Through Laboratory Examinations, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 09:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ConstantinVacheron, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Archaeology. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Haploidavey (talk) 22:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tone and style[edit]

Hello, ConstantinVacheron. I reverted your edits to Archaeology, as they were not encyclopedic in tone or style; editors should not use "we" in articles. What you added also reads like an extract from an undergraduate-level University guidebook; its source seems to have been self-published, and not peer-reviewed. Please read the links given above, and try to get a "feel" for what's acceptable in Wikipedia articles, both in terms of text and sources. The source you used does not seem notable enough in authorship to serve as a reliable source for Wikipedia, per this discussion. Please don't hesitate to ask questions if in doubt. Haploidavey (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mkd07. Your editing pattern, and particularly the source you cited in Archaeology, suggests that this account might be one of several sockpuppet accounts of User:Mkd07, whose known sockpuppet accounts have been blocked. Is this in fact the case? Haploidavey (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]