User talk:CoolKatt number 99999/Archive 3

A new start[edit]

Since that was 10 topics... CoolKatt number 99999 19:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reading your messages[edit]

Do you ever read your messages? What good is moving those to an archive WHEN YOU HAVE NOT EVEN RESPONDED TO THE MESSAGES! --CFIF (talk to me) 20:36, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United Paramount Network/UPN[edit]

Is there any particular reason why you make these unnecessary edits to the UPN link in numerous articles? Most of us, including those of us who write, edit, and vandalize television-related entries know full well what UPN stands for. And yes, I know that whether its written in full form or as an acronym, it still directs to the same page. But why not leave well-enough alone? You obviously get a kick our of doing it if you keep on doing it. BTW, I changed back your latest edit on the WPWR-TV page, and removed that ridiculous addition you made on the WWOR-TV page. Rollosmokes 22:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to this with him, but it got moved to the archive that does not exist. --CFIF (talk to me) 19:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KASA TV Albuquerque[edit]

FYI The sale of KASA should be announced this Friday. It is not being purchased by News Corporation. The sale of twelve other Raycom stations to Barrington was announced on Monday. Desert Bunny 18:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KASA TV will not be bought by Barrington[edit]

You should know that Barrington is NOT buying KASA. Raycom had 14 stations for sale. Barrington bought all but Albuquerque and Waterloo. The new owners (who are long time broadcasters) will be announced on Friday Desert Bunny 21:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia survey[edit]

Hi. I'm doing a survey of Wikipedia editors as part of a class research project. It's quick, anonymous, and the data will be made available to the Wikipedia community later this month. Would you like to take part? More info here. Thanks! Nonplus 23:49, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dumont Television Network[edit]

Thanks for your recent revisions and additions to the DuMont article. Looks better already! Keep it up! Oh, and if you find additional affiliates, don't hesitate to add them! Cheers! --Firsfron 01:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WTXF-TV[edit]

Your additions to the article regarding the events of 1994-95 are trivial. Mentioning the NFC broadcast rights, the Philadelphia Eagles, and Fox Kids takes the focus away from the main theme of the paragraph. These are items that should belong in the Fox Broadcasting Company entry, or an article on the '94-'95 affiliation changes. However, it's trivial information for WTXF-TV. So, I reverted back. Rollosmokes 08:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KTWB-TV[edit]

And, while we're at it, I've again removed your line regarding My Network TV form the KTWB-TV page. It is SPECULATION and it doesn't belong there. You must assume because Tribune has a relationship with Fox in the Seattle-Tacoma market and other cities, it is a given that KTWB, WPHL in Philadelphia and WATL in Atlanta will join My Network. You shouldn't ASSUME, because we all know what happens when you do. Rollosmokes 07:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KDKA-TV[edit]

I noticed you added back the unsourced speculation "CBS2" section. If you cannot source this in the next 7 days or so I'm going to remove it.--Isotope23 14:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]