User talk:Corderite75

Welcome!

Hello, Corderite75, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Jim W. Corder, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Matt (talk) 22:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jim W. Corder[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jim W. Corder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Matt (talk) 22:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Royce Campbell Page[edit]

Awesome! The changes you made are better than I imagined or could have done myself. I never realized he was referenced in so many publications. Power to the people! MiamiJazz (talk) 19:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...I am still searching for stuff. I know it's out there, because I have followed Campbell's career for over a decade. For example, I know that there are tons of writings about him in the publication Just Jazz Guitar, but because that venue doesn't get indexed in major research databases--Worldcat, Ebscohost, Academic Search Premiere, etc--I need to track down physical copies of the magazine, look through each issue, etc, which is gonna take some more time. I know that I read published interviews with him, as well, and seeing him mentioned among other premier guitarists in various articles I have read over the years. It's just a matter of tracking it all down and consolidating it here. Another thing to consider is the fairly sizable amount of writings about him in other languages. I have come across articles in Japanese, German, and even Italian that I couldn't read, and may not even be appropriate for the English Wikipedia anyway, but they do exist out there as verifiable sources.Also, I am pretty sure there are many more sideman projects that he has been recorded on, beyond the ones already in the article, especially things that he did in the 70s and 80s, but again, because of indexing issues--ESPECIALLY with sound recordings--they are hard to track down. I paid a ton of money for his LP, Around Town, but I have yet to track down his first, the solo project. Corderite75 (talk) 20:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - NPA[edit]

If you make further personal attacks on any editor at wikipedia such as the one you made with this edit - I will block you without any further warning. Comment on content not on the editor at all times!--VS ^talk 03:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too notable[edit]

Hey! Good news! Under Wikipedia's deletion policy Royce Campbell is too notable to be deleted because he has been on the National Jazz Charts. So they can AfD all they want. MiamiJazz (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I just hope that the editing conflicts end soon, because I want to make the Royce Campbell article as accurate and documented as possible (what can I say, I am a geeky PhD student--MLA citation style is my life!)

Your note[edit]

My pleasure. Mostly I don't judge them, I just fix them ;) LilHelpa (talk) 20:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Royce campbell.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Royce campbell.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dman41689 (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]