User talk:Cosmoskramer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Cosmoskramer. You have new messages at Fumitol's talk page.
Message added 04:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fumitol (talk) 04:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Franco Semioli[edit]

"Please provide citation", you wrote. A citation about what, exactly? The fact that Semioli was born in Cirié is no invention of mine. If you had bothered to check out the corresponding article in the Italian-language wikipedia, you would have found a couple of profiles mentioning Cirié as the place where he was born. In cases like this, you are not supposed to undo edits. If you have some doubts, all you have to do is ask. Or, if you want, place a tag. But it is definitely not a good idea to undo edits for no good reason to do so. Monegasque (talk) 08:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I don't understand...[edit]

Someone had removed all of that information. How can you even consider the re-addition of information as "vandalism"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.179.184.147 (talk) 11:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have added the following "jones is a dirty nasty wack ass rapper. foxy brown would shut her down anytime she wishes that she was trina but she aint" which is tantamount to vandalism.

If you are willing to rewrite the article according to Wikipedia's standards, then these measures will not be taken. Thanks. Cosmos 14:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism[edit]

Saw u on User:Alison, I assume she is not fast at answering back. You are new, you are not an administrator, you can not tell people that they might get blocked (ok, u can add the template level 1,2,3 {{subst:uw-vandalism1|article name}}). You do not have database rollback rights, as I as well. You can compare the 2pm version with the 4pm version, and opt for undone. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never forget your signature (click or the 4 tildes ~~~~ ), u r not right at the Image:Puffer Fish DSC01257.JPG talk page. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. :) --Chris.urs-o (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Tunguska, Castle Bravo[edit]

Could you please expand on your reasoning behind this edit? I've read both articles, and it's not clear to me where the two conflict. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm confused. Castle Bravo article does not claim its subject was the largest nuclear bomb ever exploded. It states (as well as Tsar Bomba article), that in fact the Tsar Bomba was the largest ever exploded. Unless I am misreading your statement. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:35, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arrest[edit]

Please move to discussion, this is not a tabloid magazine it is the biography of a living person. Off2riorob (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing the citations and the hot news, best regards. Oh, what is the IPCC, is it the Indian Police Criminal Commision? that souuld be added and linked to but I am not sure if that is correct? Off2riorob (talk) 11:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thannk you, I have linked it, imo for now it is enough to report the basic arrest and when we are certain what he is to be charged with we can add more then. Off2riorob (talk) 11:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is not looking good for Sw N, they will likely bring him back to Tamil Nadu or Bangalore and put him in court as he failed to attend court on the 19 April, this is a bad start for him, they may restrict bail and a trial could well follow, lets see how it goes but it will most definately require reporting in his BLP, have a nice day Cosmos. Off2riorob (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page above, if users just add nonsense characters to pages, that doesn't warrant a final warning. Also, the user self-reverted, so I'm assuming good faith. Just as a side note, you don't need to copy and paste the warnings. Use these templates according to the type of vandalism. Goodvac (talk) 04:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are reverting a bunch of vandalism, perhaps you should consider using Twinkle. You can go to your preferences, find the "Gadgets" section, and check Twinkle. But I must caution that you take full responsibility for any action performed using Twinkle. Goodvac (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for saving my article please can you help me by putting a warning message for those who try to spoil the article.

Swami ji[edit]

It has been reverted. As the provided link explains there was a discussion and a consensus to support what was there, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 11:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent reversion[edit]

You reverted this, but the edit you reverted contained an edit summary "dab Diet of Japan" ("dab" is a common Wikipedia abbreviation for "disambiguate") which strongly indicates the editor had considered the edit carefully, and if you had taken the time to check the edit, you would have seen that the original wikilink Diet does in fact need to be disambiguated per Wikipedia policy WP:DAB because it is a wikilink in mainspace to a disambiguation page. Please be more careful with reverting edits in future; I do not know whether you know that editors who use the undo tool incorrectly have had sanctions from admins. In good faith, would you self-revert your reversion to restore the status quo? Please reply here because my IP may change and I would otherwise miss your reply if you post it on my current IP's talk page. Thanks, 61.213.94.147 (talk) 14:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption[edit]

Hi, it's me, your adopter. So, do you need any help? The Arbiter 15:21, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Please link to your user page, talk page, or contributions, in your signature. Fences&Windows 20:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please heed this, see WP:SIGLINK for the guideline on this. Signatures must include a link to your user page, talk page, or contributions and users have received blocks for ignoring this as it is considered to be disruptive (it makes it hard for others to know exactly who commented and how to contact you). You could try: <b><i>[[User talk:Cosmoskramer|Cosmos]]</i></b>. Fences&Windows 11:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]