User talk:Coxparra

the purpose of this page is something of a mysteryCoxparra (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Can I say how much I appreciate your contributions towards Muggletonianism? The Civil War era is a fascinating, important and much-neglected time of our history, and it's nice to know I'm not the only one who thinks about it.

One question out of sheer curiosity: are you a muggletonian? I ask because it was my understanding (from the article) that the last of them passed away in the 1970s, but your user page seems to imply that you follow this religion. Are there, in fact, Muggletonians still among us, or have I just misread your page? BillMasen (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I daresay The World Turned Upside Down is primary-school stuff for you? There was also something to do with them somewhere in the backstreets of Bromley in Kent, in the Blyth Road neighbourhood, if I remember correctly, possibly somewhat later than 1975. I've also replied on Ruisbroec-Bloemardine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.241.227.84 (talk) 13:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

As regards your comments on Bloemardine, this may have been infighting within the Goldsmiths guild. A generalised hydrological thesis is under development inthe Belgian Town Planning historians suggesting that in the Low Countries, rivers were bridged as close to the mouth as possible given firm footings for the piers. Once bridged, the upstream navigation was restricted, and so the rivers could be barraged by watermills, often by adding extra leats above the bridge, also creating a defensible village around the bridgehead on the islands resulting. A dock would develop downstream, as the limitations on timber constrained both the size of ships and bridges. In Brussels case, this appears to have been the situation from about 900-1100, towards the start of which period the farmer on the plateau above built a defensive tower which developped into a small castrum. This farmer, Clutincx, then became Castellan and may have been closely related to the ducal house, as there is a strong likelihood the de Montforts descend from his family (the tower ended up in the de Montfort Hôtel sold in 1655 and is still there today, de Montfort being a translation of the Clutincx cognomen of Koudenberg) - we know both the ducal houses of de Montfort and Brabant descend from the Ducal House of Flanders, with serval annulments of marriage between the two because of consanginuity. The castrum developped into a fully-fledged ducal and now royal palace. The Clutincx became aldermen of the town, and goldsmiths, and as the goldsmiths' neighbourhood was quite small, they would have known Bloemardine's family well. ORIGINAL RESEARCH DECLARED: van Ruusbroec's sponsors and family were related to the Ducal House and therefore to the Clutincx. If Bloemardine sponsored a Béguinage in Brussels, then she too was of the Clutinckx as the only possible was the Terarken hospice founded by the Clutinckx between 1218 and 1226, which sheltered van Ruusbroec's mother form 1305 to her death in 1317. That béguinage is the subject of his 12 Béguines, and its dedication of his Spiritual Tabernacle. Could she have been his sister, as suggested by Pomerius? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.241.227.84 (talk) 10:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Have you linked Ruusbroec to Revelation yet? His Tabernacle theory was consolidated by Pierre d'Ailly in the Papal Supremacy justification of the Constanz Consilium, carried forwards by Nicholas of Cues and implemented by Eugenius IV on the neighbour site to the Terarken via d'Ailly's acolytes Jean de Bruges (= Jan van Brugge = Jan van Eyck - in particular, the Mystic Lamb in exegesis of the Fountain of Life, which again links to these sites) and Guillaume Dufay (L'Homme Armé - see Craig Wright's The Maze and the Warrior). See also the relationship between d'Ailly and Columbus, Cues and Copernicus/Kepler. It's revalidated by the Vatican to this day. Read those texts as I'm not being explicit about the implications, I'd suggest Thom Mertens' Lannoo edition of the Tabernacle as his introductory notes are revealing about the name Terarken and a problem about Victorine limitations - there is original contemporary supporting documentation in the public record, too. My mentors are Mertens, Till Holger Borchert and Laura Smoller Ackerman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.241.227.84 (talk) 10:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Keep up the good work!

I work over the seventeenth century generally, and our paths will continue to cross. I'd probably have some detailed stylistic comments about the articles. Anyway, the purpose of the page is to give a place for messages that would be a bit misplaced on the talk pages of articles themselves. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Professor Lamont

Hello there.

I didn't mean that I thought the Lamont quote should be removed, or was wrong in some way. My tags were just indicating that I, as a layman on the subject, didn't really understand what the quote meant. It referred to an "answer" given by Muggleton, but I didn't understand what question it was he was answering in this case.

Perhaps a slightly longer quote, or a little context from Lamont's book, would make it clear? Also, a direct citation would be good.

Otherwise, please do keep up the good work; it's a pleasure to read. BillMasen (talk) 20:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Edward Bishop Elliott and St Mark's Church, Brighton

That's OK :) I hadn't actually written the church article at the time you made the edit, but coincidentally wrote it a few days later; then Rev Elliott came up in my research, I did my usual search to check whether he had an article ... and there it was! Henry Venn Elliott could probably benefit from an article as well; I probably have enough material to put something together if I remember.

Revelation

Coxparra: I moved my comments to their proper context on my own talk page so that I'm not cluttering up your page. Please delete this message after you've read it. --gdm (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

PS: I also responded to your "moral disquiet" comment on my talk page. --gdm (talk) 03:08, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Kommissar Hjuler shall become deleted?

Hello, I am Kommissar Hjuler, I have an account here for sometime, but only now started to work by myself on the article someone started on me. Also made some articles on my wife Mama Baer, Dietmar Kirves, a colleague at the NO!art Movement and Barbara Rapp, another colleague.

I try to learn by doing, but anytime I open the artice, I am told, that I violated some rules.

I hope I did not, I am not sure, how I violated any rules, and now I am told, that the article can become deleted.

I need any help I can get,

Kommissar Hjuler mamabaer-hjuler@versanet.de —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.91.129.7 (talk) 07:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Good to hear, you like the CD, just available is the LP asylum lunaticum, by mama baer solo, different from LP, and a new LP from Italy, a split with Ninni Morgia/Sylvia Kastel with whom we start a tour in England on Friday!141.91.129.7 (talk) 11:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)